Efficacy of bone-substitute materials use in immediate dental implant placement: A systematic review and meta-analysis

John Zaki 1 2, Nermin Yusuf 3, Ahmed El-Khadem 4 5, Rob J P M Scholten 6 7, Kevin Jenniskens 6

Affiliations

08 January 2021

-

doi: 10.1111/cid.13014

Abstract

Objective: To assess the efficacy of using a bone substitute material (BSM) in the fixture-socket gap in patients undergoing tooth extraction and immediate implant placement.

Materials and methods: MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL databases were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs). RCTs were screened for eligibility, and data were extracted by two authors independently. Risk of bias (ROB) was assessed using Cochrane's ROB tool 2.0. Primary outcomes were implant failure, overall complications, and soft-tissue esthetics. Secondary outcomes were vertical buccal bone resorption, vertical interproximal bone resorption, horizontal buccal bone resorption, and mid-buccal mucosal recession. Meta-analysis was performed using random-effects model with generic inverse variance weighing. GRADE was used to grade the certainty of the evidence.

Results: After screening 19 544 potentially eligible references, 20 RCTs were included in this review, with a total of 848 patients (916 sites). Most included RCTs were deemed of some concerns (53%) or at low (38%) risk of bias, except for overall complications (high ROB). Implant failure did not differ significantly RR = 0.92 (confidence intervals [CI] 0.34 to 2.46) between using a BSM compared with not using a BSM (NoBSM). BSM use resulted in less horizontal buccal bone resorption (MD = -0.52 mm [95% CI -0.74 to -0.30]), a higher esthetic score (MD = 1.49 [95% CI 0.46 to 2.53]), but also more complications (RR = 3.50 [95% CI 1.11 to 11.1] compared with NoBSM. Too few trials compared types of BSMs against each other to allow for pooled analyses. The certainty of the evidence was considered moderate for all outcomes except implant failure (low), overall complications (very low), and vertical interproximal bone resorption (very low).

Conclusion: BSM use during immediate implant placement reduces horizontal buccal bone resorption and improves the periimplant soft-tissue esthetics. Although BSM use increases the risk of predominantly minor complications.

Keywords: bone regeneration; bone substitutes; dental implant; tooth extraction; tooth socket.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1 Literature search flowchart. *One trial was included in both analyses

FIGURE 1 Literature search flowchart. *One trial was included in both analyses

FIGURE 2 Forest‐plot of “implant failure” using a bone‐substitute material (BSM) vs no filling material (NoBSM)

FIGURE 2 Forest‐plot of “implant failure” using a bone‐substitute material (BSM) vs no filling material (NoBSM)

FIGURE 3 Forest‐plot of “overall complications” using a bone‐substitute material (BSM) vs no filling material (NoBSM)

FIGURE 3 Forest‐plot of “overall complications” using a bone‐substitute material (BSM) vs no filling material (NoBSM)

FIGURE 4 Forest‐plot of “esthetics” (pink esthetic score 0‐14) using a bone‐substitute material (BSM) vs no filling material (NoBSM)

FIGURE 4 Forest‐plot of “esthetics” (pink esthetic score 0‐14) using a bone‐substitute material (BSM) vs no filling material (NoBSM)

Similar articles

Immediate implant placement with or without socket grafting: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Seyssens L, Eeckhout C, Cosyn J.Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2022 Jun;24(3):339-351. doi: 10.1111/cid.13079. Epub 2022 Mar 21.PMID: 35313067 Review.

The socket shield technique for immediate implant placement: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Atieh MA, Shah M, Abdulkareem M, AlQahtani HA, Alsabeeha NHM.J Esthet Restor Dent. 2021 Dec;33(8):1186-1200. doi: 10.1111/jerd.12812. Epub 2021 Aug 11.PMID: 34380176 Review.

Timing of implant placement after tooth extraction: immediate, immediate-delayed or delayed implants? A Cochrane systematic review.

Esposito M, Grusovin MG, Polyzos IP, Felice P, Worthington HV.Eur J Oral Implantol. 2010 Autumn;3(3):189-205.PMID: 20847990 Review.

Influence of using collagen on the soft and hard tissue outcomes of immediate dental implant placement: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Liu J, Hua F, Zhang H, Hu J.J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2023 Feb;124(1S):101385. doi: 10.1016/j.jormas.2023.101385. Epub 2023 Jan 13.PMID: 36642247

Interventions for replacing missing teeth: alveolar ridge preservation techniques for dental implant site development.

Atieh MA, Alsabeeha NH, Payne AG, Duncan W, Faggion CM, Esposito M.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 May 28;2015(5):CD010176. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010176.pub2.PMID: 26020735 Free PMC article. Updated. Review.

Cited by

A Novel Approach for Implant Rehabilitation Combined with Immediate Bone and Soft-Tissue Augmentation in a Compromised Socket-A B2S Approach: Case Report with a 2-Year Follow-Up.

Bernatskiy BS, Puišys A.Case Rep Dent. 2023 Mar 28;2023:1376588. doi: 10.1155/2023/1376588. eCollection 2023.PMID: 37025607 Free PMC article.

KMEL References

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/

References

  1.  
    1. Araujo MG, Silva CO, Misawa M, Sukekava F. Alveolar socket healing: what can we learn? Periodontol 2000. 2015;68(1):122‐134. - PubMed
  2.  
    1. Araujo MG, Silva CO, Souza AB, Sukekava F. Socket healing with and without immediate implant placement. Periodontol 2000. 2019;79(1):168‐177. - PubMed
  3.  
    1. Botticelli D, Berglundh T, Lindhe J. Hard‐tissue alterations following immediate implant placement in extraction sites. J Clin Periodontol. 2004;31(10):820‐828. - PubMed
  4.  
    1. Chappuis V, Araujo MG, Buser D. Clinical relevance of dimensional bone and soft tissue alterations post‐extraction in esthetic sites. Periodontol 2000. 2017;73(1):73‐83. - PubMed
  5.  
    1. Cosyn J, De Lat L, Seyssens L, Doornewaard R, Deschepper E, Vervaeke S. The effectiveness of immediate implant placement for single tooth replacement compared to delayed implant placement: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. J Clin Periodontol. 2019;46:224‐241. - PubMed
  6.  
    1. Mello CC, Lemos CAA, Verri FR, Dos Santos DM, Goiato MC, Pellizzer EP. Immediate implant placement into fresh extraction sockets versus delayed implants into healed sockets: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2017;46(9):1162‐1177. - PubMed
  7.  
    1. Atieh MA, Alsabeeha NH, Payne AG, Duncan W, Faggion CM, Esposito M. Interventions for replacing missing teeth: alveolar ridge preservation techniques for dental implant site development. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;5:CD010176. - PMC - PubMed
  8.  
    1. Fillingham Y, Jacobs J. Bone grafts and their substitutes. Bone Joint J. 2016;98B:6‐9. - PubMed
  9.  
    1. Jambhekar S, Kernen F, Bidra AS. Clinical and histologic outcomes of socket grafting after flapless tooth extraction: a systematic review of randomized controlled clinical trials. J Prosthet Dent. 2015;113(5):371‐382. - PubMed
  10.  
    1. MacBeth N, Trullenque‐Eriksson A, Donos N, Mardas N. Hard and soft tissue changes following alveolar ridge preservation: a systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2017;28(8):982‐1004. - PubMed
  11.  
    1. Papageorgiou SN, Papageorgiou PN, Deschner J, Gotz W. Comparative effectiveness of natural and synthetic bone grafts in oral and maxillofacial surgery prior to insertion of dental implants: systematic review and network meta‐analysis of parallel and cluster randomized controlled trials. J Dent. 2016;48:1‐8. - PubMed
  12.  
    1. AlKudmani H, Al Jasser R, Andreana S. Is bone graft or guided bone regeneration needed when placing immediate dental implants? A systematic review. Implant Dent. 2017;26(6):936‐944. - PubMed
  13.  
    1. Clementini M, Tiravia L, De Risi V, Vittorini Orgeas G, Mannocci A, de Sanctis M. Dimensional changes after immediate implant placement with or without simultaneous regenerative procedures: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. J Clin Periodontol. 2015;42(7):666‐677. - PubMed
  14.  
    1. Lee J, Park D, Koo KT, Seol YJ, Lee YM. Validity of a regenerative procedure for a minor bone defect with immediate implant placement: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Acta Odontol Scand. 2019;77(2):99‐106. - PubMed
  15.  
    1. Mohamed HHB, Serag Eldien AM, Zahran A. Augmentation versus no augmentation for immediate postextraction implants. Int J Dent. 2018;2018:5209108. - PMC - PubMed
  16.  
    1. Higgins JPT, Thomas J, Chandler J, et al. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Vol 2019. 2nd ed.Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons; 2019.
  17.  
    1. Moher D, Shamseer L, Clarke M, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta‐analysis protocols (PRISMA‐P) 2015 statement. Syst Rev. 2015;4:2046‐4053. - PMC - PubMed
  18.  
    1. University of York . 'PROSPERO' The International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews. https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/ Accessed date March 15, 2021.
  19.  
    1. The EndNote Team . EndNote, EndNote X9 ed. Philadelphia, PA: Clarivate Analytics; 2013.
  20.  
    1. Smith DE, Zarb GA. Criteria for success of osseointegrated endosseous implants. J Prosthet Dent. 1989;62(5):567‐572. - PubMed
  21.  
    1. Furhauser R, Florescu D, Benesch T, Haas R, Mailath G, Watzek G. Evaluation of soft tissue around single‐tooth implant crowns: the pink esthetic score. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2005;16(6):639‐644. - PubMed
  22.  
    1. Chen J, Chiang C, Zhang Y. Esthetic evaluation of natural teeth in anterior maxilla using the pink and white esthetic scores. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2018;20(5):770‐777. - PubMed
  23.  
    1. Cosyn J, Eghbali A, De Bruyn H, Dierens M, De Rouck T. Single implant treatment in healing versus healed sites of the anterior maxilla: an aesthetic evaluation. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2012;14(4):517‐526. - PubMed
  24.  
    1. Sterne JAC, Savovic J, Page MJ, et al. RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. 2019;366:l4898. - PubMed
  25.  
    1. McGuinness LA, Higgins J. Risk‐of‐bias VISualization (robvis): an R package and shiny web app for visualizing risk‐of‐bias assessments. Res Synth Methods. 2020;12(1):55‐61. 10.1002/jrsm.1411. - DOI - PubMed
  26.  
    1. Schünemann H, Brożek J, Guyatt G, Oxman A. GRADE Handbook for Grading Quality of Evidence and Strength of Recommendations.: The GRADE Working Group; 2013.
  27.  
    1. Evidence Prime I . GRADEpro GDT: GRADEpro Guideline Development Tool [Software]. Hamilton, ON: McMaster University; 2015.
  28.  
    1. Cochrane RevMan . Review Manager (RevMan), 5.4 Ed. London: The Cochrane Collaboration; 2020.
  29.  
    1. Higgins JP, Altman DG, Gotzsche PC, et al. The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. 2011;343:d5928. - PMC - PubMed
  30.  
    1. Bittner N, Fau‐Planzos L, Planzos L, et al. Evaluation of horizontal and vertical buccal ridge dimensional changes after immediate implant placement and immediate temporization with and without bone augmentation procedures: short‐term, 1‐year results. A randomized controlled clinical trial. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2020;40(1):83‐93. - PubMed
  31.  
    1. Chen ST, Darby IB, Adams GG, Reynolds EC. A prospective clinical study of bone augmentation techniques at immediate implants. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2005;16(2):176‐184. - PubMed
  32.  
    1. Chen ST, Darby IB, Reynolds EC. A prospective clinical study of non‐submerged immediate implants: clinical outcomes and esthetic results. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2007;18(5):552‐562. - PubMed
  33.  
    1. Cornelini R, Cangini F, Martuscelli G, Wennstrom J. Deproteinized bovine bone and biodegradable barrier membranes to support healing following immediate placement of transmucosal implants: a short‐term controlled clinical trial. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2004;24(6):555‐563. - PubMed
  34.  
    1. Daif ET. Effect of a multiporous beta‐tricalicum phosphate on bone density around dental implants inserted into fresh extraction sockets. J Oral Implantol. 2013;39(3):339‐344. - PubMed
  35.  
    1. Angelis ND, Felice P, Pellegrino G, Camurati A, Gambino P, Esposito M. Guided bone regeneration with and without a bone substitute at single post‐extractive implants: 1‐year post‐loading results from a pragmatic multicentre randomised controlled trial. Eur J Oral Implantol. 2011;4(4):313‐325. - PubMed
  36.  
    1. Gher ME, Quintero G, Assad D, Monaco E, Richardson AC. Bone grafting and guided bone regeneration for immediate dental implants in humans. J Periodontol. 1994;65(9):881‐891. - PubMed
  37.  
    1. Girlanda FF, Feng HS, Correa MG, et al. Deproteinized bovine bone derived with collagen improves soft and bone tissue outcomes in flapless immediate implant approach and immediate provisionalization: a randomized clinical trial. Clin Oral Investig. 2019;23(10):3885‐3893. - PubMed
  38.  
    1. Grassi FR, Grassi R, Rapone B, Alemanno G, Balena A, Kalemaj Z. Dimensional changes of buccal bone plate in immediate implants inserted through open flap, open flap and bone grafting and flapless techniques: a cone‐beam computed tomography randomized controlled clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2019;30(12):1155‐1164. - PubMed
  39.  
    1. Jacobs BP, Zadeh HH, De Kok I, Cooper L. A randomized controlled trial evaluating grafting the facial gap at immediately placed implants. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2020;40(3):383‐392. - PubMed
  40.  
    1. Mastrangelo F, Gastaldi G, Vinci R, et al. Immediate postextractive implants with and without bone graft: 3‐year follow‐up results from a multicenter controlled randomized trial. Implant Dent. 2018;27(6):638‐645. - PubMed
  41.  
    1. Huda M, Sherirn HM, Amr Z, Ahmed R. Clinical evaluation of the stability of the immediately loaded dental implants with and without bone grafting materials in the maxillary premolar extraction sockets. EDJ. 2018;64(3):1145‐1154.
  42.  
    1. Paknejad M, Akbari S, Aslroosta H, Panjnoush M, Hajheidary S. Effect of flapless immediate implantation and filling the Buccal gap with Xenograft material on the buccal bone level: a randomized clinical trial. J Dent (Tehran). 2017;14(6):344‐351. - PMC - PubMed
  43.  
    1. Prosper P, Gherlone EF, Redaelli S, Quaranta M. Four‐year follow‐up of larger‐diameter implants placed in fresh extraction sockets using a resorbable membrane or a resorbable alloplastic material. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2003;18(6):856‐864. - PubMed
  44.  
    1. Sanz M, Lindhe J, Alcaraz J, Sanz‐Sanchez I, Cecchinato D. The effect of placing a bone replacement graft in the gap at immediately placed implants: a randomized clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2017;28(8):902‐910. - PubMed
  45.  
    1. Spinato S, Agnini A, Chiesi M, Agnini AM, Wang HL. Comparison between graft and no‐graft in an immediate placed and immediate nonfunctional loaded implant. Implant Dent. 2012;21(2):97‐103. - PubMed
  46.  
    1. Yuenyongorarn P, Kan JYK, Rungcharassaeng K, et al. Facial gingival changes with and without socket gap grafting following single maxillary anterior immediate tooth replacement: 1‐year results. J Oral Implantol. 2020;46(5):496‐505. - PubMed
  47.  
    1. Adam SAN, Elarab AE, Rahman ARA, Rahim DFA, Nouby S. Evaluation of implant stability and marginal bone loss in immediate implant using “nano bone” versus “autogenous bone” for the treatment of patients with unrestorable single tooth: a randomized controlled trial. J Osseointegr. 2019;12(1):8‐17.
  48.  
    1. Viswambaran M, Arora V, Tripathi RC, Dhiman RK. Clinical evaluation of immediate implants using different types of bone augmentation materials. Med J Armed Forces India. 2014;70(2):154‐162. - PMC - PubMed
  49.  
    1. Noelken R, Pausch T, Wagner W, Al‐Nawas B. Peri‐implant defect grafting with autogenous bone or bone graft material in immediate implant placement in molar extraction sites‐1‐ to 3‐year results of a prospective randomized study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2020;31(11):1138‐1148. - PubMed
  50.  
    1. Lin G, Ye S, Liu F, He F. A retrospective study of 30,959 implants: risk factors associated with early and late implant loss. J Clin Periodontol. 2018;45(6):733‐743. - PubMed
  51.  
    1. Lim G, Lin GH, Monje A, Chan HL, Wang HL. Wound healing complications following guided bone regeneration for ridge augmentation: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2018;33(1):41‐50. - PubMed
  52.  
    1. Avila‐Ortiz G, Chambrone L, Vignoletti F. Effect of alveolar ridge preservation interventions following tooth extraction: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. J Clin Periodontol. 2019;46:195‐223. - PubMed
  53.  
    1. Chu SJ, Salama MA, Salama H, et al. The dual‐zone therapeutic concept of managing immediate implant placement and provisional restoration in anterior extraction sockets. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2012;33(7):524‐532. - PubMed
  54.  
    1. Chen ST, Buser D. Esthetic outcomes following immediate and early implant placement in the anterior maxilla: a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2014;29:186‐215. - PubMed
  55.  
    1. Farronato D, Pasini PM, Orsina AA, Manfredini M, Azzi L, Farronato M. Correlation between buccal bone thickness at implant placement in healed sites and buccal soft tissue maturation pattern: a prospective three‐year study. Materials (Basel). 2020;13(3):511. - PMC - PubMed
  56.  
    1. Araujo MG, Lindhe J. Dimensional ridge alterations following tooth extraction. An experimental study in the dog. J Clin Periodontol. 2005;32(2):212‐218. - PubMed
  57.  
    1. Bohner LOL, Mukai E, Oderich E, et al. Comparative analysis of imaging techniques for diagnostic accuracy of peri‐implant bone defects: a meta‐analysis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2017;124(4):432‐440. - PubMed
  58.  
    1. Naveau A, Shinmyouzu K, Moore C, Avivi‐Arber L, Jokerst J, Koka S. Etiology and measurement of peri‐implant crestal bone loss (CBL). J Clin Med. 2019;8(2):166. - PMC - PubMed
  59.  
    1. Ritter L, Elger MC, Rothamel D, et al. Accuracy of peri‐implant bone evaluation using cone beam CT, digital intra‐oral radiographs and histology. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2014;43(6):20130088. - PMC - PubMed
  60.  
    1. Elnayef B, Porta C, Suarez‐Lopez Del Amo F, Mordini L, Gargallo‐Albiol J, Hernandez‐Alfaro F. The fate of lateral ridge augmentation: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2018;33(3):622‐635. - PubMed
  61.  
    1. Jung RE, Heitz‐Mayfield L, Schwarz F, Groups of the 2nd Osteology Foundation Consensus M . Evidence‐based knowledge on the aesthetics and maintenance of peri‐implant soft tissues: osteology foundation consensus report part 3‐aesthetics of peri‐implant soft tissues. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018;29:14‐17. - PubMed
  62.  
    1. Pohl V, Furhauser L, Haas R, Pohl S. Gingival recession behavior with immediate implant placement in the anterior maxilla with buccal dehiscence without additional augmentation‐a pilot study. Clin Oral Investig. 2020;24(4):1455‐1464. - PubMed
  63.  
    1. Benic GI, Mokti M, Chen CJ, Weber HP, Hammerle CH, Gallucci GO. Dimensions of buccal bone and mucosa at immediately placed implants after 7 years: a clinical and cone beam computed tomography study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012;23(5):560‐566. - PubMed
  64.  
    1. Willenbacher M, Al‐Nawas B, Berres M, Kammerer PW, Schiegnitz E. The effects of alveolar ridge preservation: a meta‐analysis. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2016;18(6):1248‐1268. - PubMed
  65.  
    1. Zhao H, Hu J, Zhao L. Histological analysis of socket preservation using DBBM. A systematic review and meta‐analysis. J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2020;121(6):729‐735. - PubMed
  66.  
    1. Couso‐Queiruga E, Stuhr S, Tattan M, Chambrone L, Avila‐Ortiz G. Post‐extraction dimensional changes: a systematic review & meta‐analysis. J Clin Periodontol. 2020;48(1):126‐144. - PubMed
  67.  
    1. Seyssens L, De Lat L, Cosyn J. Immediate implant placement with or without connective tissue graft: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. J Clin Periodontol. 2020;48(2):284‐301. - PubMed
  68.  
    1. Tsigarida A, Toscano J, de Brito BB, et al. Buccal bone thickness of maxillary anterior teeth: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. J Clin Periodontol. 2020;47(11):1326‐1343. - PubMed
  69.  
    1. 0.02w?>Nikiforidou M, Tsalikis L, Angelopoulos C, Menexes G, Vouros I, Konstantinides A. Classification of periodontal biotypes with the use of CBCT. A cross‐sectional study. Clin Oral Investig. 2016;20(8):2061‐2071. - PubMed
  70.  
    1. Yang X, Zhou T, Zhou N, Man Y. The thickness of labial bone affects the esthetics of immediate implant placement and provisionalization in the esthetic zone: a prospective cohort study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2019;21(3):482‐491. - PubMed
  71.  
    1. Insua A, Monje A, Wang HL, Inglehart M. Patient‐centered perspectives and understanding of peri‐implantitis. J Periodontol. 2017;88(11):1153‐1162. - PubMed
  72.  
    1. Schwarz F, Derks J, Monje A, Wang HL. Peri‐implantitis. J Periodontol. 2018;89:S267‐S290. - PubMed
  73.  
    1. Kinaia BM, Kazerani S, Korkis S, Masabni OM, Shah M, Neely AL. Effect of guided bone regeneration on immediately placed implants: meta‐analyses with at least 12 months follow up after functional loading. J Periodontol. 2019;(1):1‐12. - PubMed
  74.  
    1. Bottini LP, Ricci L, Piattelli A, Perrotti V, Iezzi G. RETRACTED: bucco‐lingual crestal bone changes around implants immediately placed in fresh extraction sockets in association or not with porcine bone: a non‐blinded randomized controlled trial in humans. J Periodontol. 2012;88(12):1374. 10.1902/jop.2012.120396. - DOI - PubMed

Page Navigation