Point tenderness at 1 of 5 locations and limited elbow extension identify significant injury in children with acute elbow trauma: a study of diagnostic accuracy
Affiliations
Affiliations
- McGill University, Montreal, Canada, Department of Pediatric Emergency Medicine, Montreal Children's Hospital-McGill University Health Center, Montreal, Canada. Electronic address: sasha.dubrovsky@mcgill.ca.
- Child Health Clinical Research Centre, Montreal Children's Hospital-Research Institute of the McGill University Health Center, Montreal, Canada. Electronic address: elise.mok@muhc.mcgill.ca.
- Montreal Children's Hospital-McGill University Health Center, Montreal, Canada. Electronic address: sukyee.lau@muhc.mcgill.ca.
- Pediatric Emergency Medicine, Al Sabah Hospital, Ministry Of Health, Kuwait, Kuwait. Electronic address: Dr.alhumaidan@yahoo.com.
Abstract
Objective: Our goal was to determine whether the combination of tenderness at 1 of 5 commonly fractured sites and elbow extension accurately predicts the presence of acute elbow fractures or isolated effusions in children.
Methods: A prospective cohort study was performed using a convenience sample of patients. Children 0 to 18 years old with acute elbow injuries without elbow deformities or radial head subluxations were prospectively enrolled. The treating physicians assessed the injured elbow for the presence of tenderness at 5 locations and for abnormal active extension. The examination was defined as positive if any one component was present and negative if all were absent. The radiologist's report or a structured follow-up phone call was used as an a priori-determined composite reference standard for the diagnosis of (1) fracture or isolated effusion and (2) fracture.
Results: A total of 332 patients were enrolled; 183 (55.1%) were diagnosed with a fracture (31.0%) or effusion (24.1%). A negative examination result was present in 33 (9.9%), among whom 6 were diagnosed with a small effusion and 1 with a radial neck fracture. The examination's sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values (95% confidence interval) were 96.2% (92.0-98.3), 17.4% (11.9-24.7), 58.4% (52.6-64.2), and 60.3% (47.8-72.9), respectively, for fracture or isolated effusion and 99.0% (97.1-100), 14.0% (9.5-18.5), 34.1% (28.7-39.5), and 97.0% (91.1-100.0), respectively, for fracture. A planned subgroup analysis of children younger than 3 years was performed; the elbow extension test was insensitive (sensitivity, 73.3% [51.0-95.7]) at excluding elbow injuries, albeit, when combined with point tenderness, it identified 100% of elbow fractures or effusions.
Conclusion: The addition of point tenderness to the elbow extension test is highly sensitive at identifying injuries in children with acute elbow injuries, albeit nonspecific. Although the significance of omitting 10% of radiographs is questionable, a cost-benefit analysis would help clarify its potential savings in terms of expenditure and/or radiation exposure when compared to the risk of missing 2% of children with elbow injuries (albeit mainly small effusions).
Similar articles
Jie KE, van Dam LF, Verhagen TF, Hammacher ER.Ann Emerg Med. 2014 Jul;64(1):74-8. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2014.01.022. Epub 2014 Feb 13.PMID: 24530106
Performance of the 4-way range of motion test for radiographic injuries after blunt elbow trauma.
Vinson DR, Kann GS, Gaona SD, Panacek EA.Am J Emerg Med. 2016 Feb;34(2):235-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2015.10.031. Epub 2015 Oct 24.PMID: 26597495
Preservation of active range of motion after acute elbow trauma predicts absence of elbow fracture.
Darracq MA, Vinson DR, Panacek EA.Am J Emerg Med. 2008 Sep;26(7):779-82. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2007.11.005.PMID: 18774042 Clinical Trial.
Aspiration of the elbow joint for treating radial head fractures.
Foocharoen T, Foocharoen C, Laopaiboon M, Tiamklang T.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Nov 22;(11):CD009949. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009949.pub2.PMID: 25416525 Review.
[Elbow injuries in childhood].
Weise K, Schwab E, Scheufele TM.Unfallchirurg. 1997 Apr;100(4):255-69. doi: 10.1007/s001130050117.PMID: 9229775 Review. German.
Cited by
The Telemedicine-Based Pediatric Examination of the Neck and Upper Limbs: A Narrative Review.
Boisvert-Plante V, Noutsios CD, Perez J, Ingelmo P.J Pain Res. 2021 Oct 11;14:3173-3192. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S336168. eCollection 2021.PMID: 34675645 Free PMC article. Review.
Negaard M, Vakkalanka P, Whipple MT, Hogrefe C, Swanson MB, Harland KK, Mathiasen R, Van Heukelom J, Thomsen TW, Mohr NM.West J Emerg Med. 2019 Aug 26;20(5):747-759. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2019.5.42952.PMID: 31539332 Free PMC article.