Role of nasal challenge and local eosinophilia in indirect exposure to cat in allergic rhinitis patients
Affiliations
Affiliations
- Microbiology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Kuwait University, Kuwait.
- Al-Rashed Allergy Center, Ministry of health, Kuwait.
- Medical Faculty, University of Tuzla, Tuzla, Bosnia and Herzegovina.
Abstract
Introduction. Sensitization to cat allergens is common worldwide. Currently, there is a trend towards costly and often unavailable diagnostic analysis. Objectives. The aim is to assess the reliability of skin prick test (SPT) and serum specific IgE (ssIgE) to cat sensitization, by performing nasal challenge test (NCT) in a community with low cat ownership but common presence of stray cats. Patients and methods. Forty-one pa-tients with perennial allergic rhinitis (AR) who were mono or polysensitized (including cat) were included. We had 31 cat non-owners and 10 present cat owners. SPT (> 5 mm / diameter), ssIgE (≥ 0.70 IU/ml), nasal smear for eosinophil (Eo) and NCT were compared between groups. Outcomes included nasal challenge score, nasal Eo positivity, peak inspiratory and expiratory flow (PIF and PEF) 2 and 8 hours after the NCT, and were compared to baseline. Results. Baseline SPT wheal size and ssIgE level were similar in both groups. NCT positivity was more frequent in cat owners. The strongest nasal reaction was on the top concentration in both groups. Nasal Eo positivity in cat owners was higher before and 2 hours after NCT, but similar to non-owners at last measurement. NCT positive cat non-owners had bigger SPT wheal size than NCT negative non-owners, but smaller than NCT positive cat owners. In contrast to PEF, a significant fall in PIF was noticed in both groups. Mono and polysensitised patients showed similar NCT positivity. Conclusion. Stray cats may pose a relevant risk of developing perennial AR. Regardless of cat ownership status, SPT and ssIgE should be the first diagnostic tool. Nasal Eo and NCT seem to be good diagnostic tools in cat non-owners if diagnosis is elusive.
Keywords: cat; nasal challenge; nasal eosinophil; sensitization.
Similar articles
Sensitization to Cat: When Is Nasal Challenge Needed?
Al-Ahmad M, Jusufovic E, Arifhodzic N, Nurkic J, Hanoun AL.Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 2019;179(2):108-113. doi: 10.1159/000496835. Epub 2019 Apr 10.PMID: 30970353
Romero JN, Scadding G.Rhinology. 1992 Sep;30(3):169-75.PMID: 1448673
Wanjun W, Qiurong H, Yanqing X, Mo X, Nili W, Jing L.Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2018 Jul;32(4):236-243. doi: 10.1177/1945892418779435. Epub 2018 Jun 17.PMID: 29909644
Allergic rhinitis with negative skin tests: does it exist?
Khan DA.Allergy Asthma Proc. 2009 Sep-Oct;30(5):465-9. doi: 10.2500/aap.2009.30.3265.PMID: 19843399 Review.
[Nasal provocation tests in the diagnosis of allergic rhinitis].
Semik-Orzech A, Gasior G, Barczyk A, Pierzchała W.Wiad Lek. 2006;59(5-6):396-402.PMID: 17017490 Review. Polish.
Cited by
Scraping nasal cytology in the diagnostics of rhinitis and the comorbidities.
Myszkowska D, Bazgier M, Brońska S, Nowak K, Ożga J, Woźniak A, Stanisz A, Szaleniec J.Sci Rep. 2022 Aug 25;12(1):14492. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-18734-3.PMID: 36008516 Free PMC article.
ARIA 2019 Care Pathways for Allergic Rhinitis in the Kuwait Health Care System.
Al-Ahmad M, Nurkic J, Bachert C, Pfaar O, Schunemann HJ, Czarlewski W, Bedbrook A, Bosquet J.Med Princ Pract. 2021;30(4):320-330. doi: 10.1159/000512493. Epub 2020 Oct 23.PMID: 33099546 Free PMC article. Review.
Santamaría L, Calle A, Tejada-Giraldo Biol M, Calvo V, Sánchez J, Cardona R.World Allergy Organ J. 2020 Sep 28;13(9):100461. doi: 10.1016/j.waojou.2020.100461. eCollection 2020 Sep.PMID: 33014258 Free PMC article.
Nasal Provocation Test with Cat and Dog Extracts: Results according to Molecular Components.
Sánchez A, Cardona R, Munera M, Calvo V, Tejada-Giraldo M, Sánchez J.Pulm Med. 2020 Jan 24;2020:6365314. doi: 10.1155/2020/6365314. eCollection 2020.PMID: 32047667 Free PMC article.