Metastatic bone disease: evaluation by functional imaging in correlation with morphologic modalities

Affiliations

01 January 2009


Abstract

The diagnosis of presence, location and load of metastatic, bone involvement has important implication on patient management and prognosis. This requires collection of data obtained using different imaging modalities. Bone scintigraphy is a highly sensitive and cost-effective screening modality. However, to overcome its lower specificity and its limitation in evaluation of vertebral metastases, CT, PET or MRI can be utilized to verify the nature of suspicious lesions. Expansion of SPECT/ CT may fine tune the highly sensitive bone scintigraphy. PET has an emerging and leading role in many tumors, occasionally obviating the need for bone scintigraphy, particularly in evaluation of response to therapy. PET and whole body MRI offers a potentially important tool to provide the earliest clue of bone marrow metastasis. The value of F-18 PET as a sensitive bone imaging tool needs to be further evaluated on a larger scale in different setting including treated and untreated cancer patients and to evaluate also whether potentially better resolution would lead to more benign lesions detection mimicking metastasis such as fractures, inflammatory, infection, and degenerative involvement of bone. The added value of PET-CT is also to be further examined with this regard.


Similar articles

The detection of bone metastases in patients with high-risk prostate cancer: 99mTc-MDP Planar bone scintigraphy, single- and multi-field-of-view SPECT, 18F-fluoride PET, and 18F-fluoride PET/CT.

Even-Sapir E, Metser U, Mishani E, Lievshitz G, Lerman H, Leibovitch I.J Nucl Med. 2006 Feb;47(2):287-97.PMID: 16455635

Diagnostic value of MRI in comparison to scintigraphy, PET, MS-CT and PET/CT for the detection of metastases of bone.

Ghanem N, Uhl M, Brink I, Schäfer O, Kelly T, Moser E, Langer M.Eur J Radiol. 2005 Jul;55(1):41-55. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2005.01.016.PMID: 15950100 Review.

Detection of hematogenous bone metastasis in cervical cancer: 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography versus computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging.

Liu FY, Yen TC, Chen MY, Lai CH, Chang TC, Chou HH, Hong JH, Chen YR, Ng KK.Cancer. 2009 Dec 1;115(23):5470-80. doi: 10.1002/cncr.24599.PMID: 19739235

Imaging of malignant bone involvement by morphologic, scintigraphic, and hybrid modalities.

Even-Sapir E.J Nucl Med. 2005 Aug;46(8):1356-67.PMID: 16085595 Review.

Assessment of malignant skeletal disease: initial experience with 18F-fluoride PET/CT and comparison between 18F-fluoride PET and 18F-fluoride PET/CT.

Even-Sapir E, Metser U, Flusser G, Zuriel L, Kollender Y, Lerman H, Lievshitz G, Ron I, Mishani E.J Nucl Med. 2004 Feb;45(2):272-8.PMID: 14960647 Clinical Trial.


Cited by

An Experimental Study for Minimum Level of Decalcification to Detect the Osteolytic Bone Metastasis of Long Bone on Plain Radiography.

Baek JH, Park IH, Seo SH.J Bone Metab. 2016 Aug;23(3):135-42. doi: 10.11005/jbm.2016.23.3.135. Epub 2016 Aug 31.PMID: 27622177 Free PMC article.

Imaging of vertebral fractures.

Panda A, Das CJ, Baruah U.Indian J Endocrinol Metab. 2014 May;18(3):295-303. doi: 10.4103/2230-8210.131140.PMID: 24944921 Free PMC article. Review.


KMEL References