Comparison of pain and extent of anesthesia in digital blocks for isolated finger lacerations: A randomized controlled trial

Ali Jarragh 1, Ali Lari 2, Waleed Burhamah 3, Mohammed Alherz 4, Abdullah Nouri 2, Yahia Alshammari 2, Ameer Al-Jasim 5, Sulaiman AlRefai 2, Naser Alnusif 2

Affiliations

07 January 2022

-

doi: 10.4103/tjem.tjem_344_21

Abstract

Objectives: Digital injuries are among the most common presentations to the emergency department. In order to sufficiently examine and manage these injuries, adequate, prompt, and predictable anesthesia is essential. In this trial, we aim to primarily compare the degree of pain and anesthesia onset time between the two-injection dorsal block technique (TD) and the single-injection volar subcutaneous block (SV) technique. Further, we describe the temporal and anatomical effects of both techniques for an accurate delineation of the anesthetized regions.

Methods: This is a single-center prospective randomized controlled trial involving patients presenting with isolated wounds to the fingers requiring primary repair under local anesthesia. Patients were randomized to either the SV or TD blocks. The primary outcome was procedure-related pain (Numerical Rating Scale). Further, we assessed the extent of anesthesia along with the anesthesia onset time.

Results: A total of 100 patients were included in the final analysis, 50 on each arm of the study. The median pain score during injection was significantly higher in patients who received TD block than patients who received SV block (median [interquartile range] = 4 [2.25, 5.00] vs. 3.00 [2.00, 4.00], respectively, P = 0.006). However, anesthesia onset time was not statistically different among the groups (P = 0.39). The extent of anesthesia was more predictable in the dorsal block compared to the volar block.

Conclusion: The single-injection volar subcutaneous blocks are less painful with a similar anesthesia onset time. Injuries presenting in the proximal dorsal region may benefit from the two-injection dorsal blocks, given the anatomical differences and timely anesthesia of the region.

Keywords: Anesthetic techniques; digital nerve block; finger laceration; hand trauma; local anesthesia; nerve block.

Conflict of interest statement

None declared.

Figures

Figure 1 CONSORT Flowchart displaying enrolment, allocation, follow up and analysis of participants

Figure 1 CONSORT Flowchart displaying enrolment, allocation, follow up and analysis of participants

Figure 3 Schematics depicting anaesthesia onset time measured at 30-second intervals in all participants. Values labelled according to their respective regions represent the median anaesthesia onset time in seconds. The grey colour gradient shows speed of anaesthesia from darkest (fastest) to lightest (slowest) show full caption

Figure 3 Schematics depicting anaesthesia onset time measured at 30-second intervals in all participants. Values labelled according to their respective regions represent the median anaesthesia onset time in seconds. The grey colour gradient shows speed of anaesthesia from darkest (fastest) to lightest (slowest) show full caption

Figure 2 Distribution of (A) procedure-related pain and (B) anesthesia onset time between groups. Dorsal; TD, Volar; SV

Figure 2 Distribution of (A) procedure-related pain and (B) anesthesia onset time between groups. Dorsal; TD, Volar; SV

Similar articles

Regional anaesthesia on the finger: Traditional dorsal digital nerve block versus subcutaneous volar nerve block, a randomized controlled trial.

Clement P, Doomen L, van Hooft M, Hessels R.Injury. 2021 Apr;52(4):883-888. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2021.03.005. Epub 2021 Mar 5.PMID: 33731291 Clinical Trial.

Randomized comparison of the single-injection volar subcutaneous block and the two-injection dorsal block for digital anesthesia.

Williams JG, Lalonde DH.Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006 Oct;118(5):1195-1200. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000237016.00941.96.PMID: 17016190 Clinical Trial.

Double-dorsal versus single-volar digital subcutaneous anaesthetic injection for finger injuries in the emergency department: A randomised controlled trial.

Martin SP, Chu KH, Mahmoud I, Greenslade JH, Brown AF.Emerg Med Australas. 2016 Apr;28(2):193-8. doi: 10.1111/1742-6723.12559. Epub 2016 Mar 16.PMID: 26991958 Clinical Trial.

A comparison of traditional digital blocks and single subcutaneous palmar injection blocks at the base of the finger and a meta-analysis of the digital block trials.

Yin ZG, Zhang JB, Kan SL, Wang P.J Hand Surg Br. 2006 Oct;31(5):547-55. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsb.2006.06.001. Epub 2006 Aug 22.PMID: 16930788 Review.

Digital Nerve Blocks: A Comprehensive Review of Techniques.

Gottlieb M, Penington A, Schraft E.J Emerg Med. 2022 Oct;63(4):533-540. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2022.07.002. Epub 2022 Oct 11.PMID: 36229322 Review.

Cited by

A Comparative Study to Evaluate the Anesthetic Efficacy of Buffered Versus Non-buffered 2% Lidocaine During Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block.

Jain TK, Jha R, Tiwari A, Agrawal N, Mali S, Sinha A, Bagde H, Singh R.Cureus. 2022 Nov 24;14(11):e31855. doi: 10.7759/cureus.31855. eCollection 2022 Nov.PMID: 36582560 Free PMC article.

KMEL References

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/

References

  1.  
    1. Ootes D, Lambers KT, Ring DC. The epidemiology of upper extremity injuries presenting to the emergency department in the United States. Hand (N Y) 2012;7:18–22. - PMC - PubMed
  2.  
    1. Robson AK, Bloom PA. Suturing of digital lacerations: Digital block or local infiltration? Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1990;72:360–1. - PMC - PubMed
  3.  
    1. Chale S, Singer AJ, Marchini S, McBride MJ, Kennedy D. Digital versus local anesthesia for finger lacerations: A randomized controlled trial. Acad Emerg Med. 2006;13:1046–50. - PubMed
  4.  
    1. Myers S. Intermetacarpal Blocks. 2008. [Last accessed on 2015 Dec 06]. Available from: http://www.myhand.com.au/health-professionals/injection-techniques/inter... .
  5.  
    1. Hart RG, Fernandas FA, Kutz JE. Transthecal digital block: An underutilized technique in the ED. Am J Emerg Med. 2005;23:340–2. - PubMed
  6.  
    1. Braun H, Harris ML, editors. In: Local Anesthesia: Its Scientific Basis and Practical Use. 2nd ed. New York: Lea & Febiger; 1924. Operations on the extremities; pp. 366–7.
  7.  
    1. Harbison S. “Transthecal digital block: Flexor tendon sheath used for anaesthetic infusion”. J Hand Surg Am. 1991;16:957. - PubMed
  8.  
    1. Bonett DG, Price RM. Statistical inference for a linear function of medians: Confidence intervals, hypothesis testing, and sample size requirements. Psychol Methods. 2002;7:370–83. - PubMed
  9.  
    1. Low CK, Vartany A, Engstrom JW, Poncelet A, Diao E. Comparison of transthecal and subcutaneous single-injection digital block techniques. J Hand Surg Am. 1997;22:901–5. - PubMed
  10.  
    1. Vinycomb TI, Sahhar LJ. Comparison of local anesthetics for digital nerve blocks: A systematic review. J Hand Surg Am. 2014;39:744–51.e5. - PubMed
  11.  
    1. Afridi RA, Masood T, Ahmed E, Obaidullah AM, Alvi HF. Comparison of the efficacy of single volar subcutaneous digital block and the dorsal two injections block. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2014;26:88–91. - PubMed
  12.  
    1. Clement P, Doomen L, van Hooft M, Hessels R. Regional anaesthesia on the finger: Traditional dorsal digital nerve block versus subcutaneous volar nerve block, a randomized controlled trial. Injury. 2021;52:883–8. - PubMed
  13.  
    1. Yin ZG, Zhang JB, Kan SL, Wang P. A comparison of traditional digital blocks and single subcutaneous palmar injection blocks at the base of the finger and a meta-analysis of the digital block trials. J Hand Surg Br. 2006;31:547–55. - PubMed
  14.  
    1. Williams JG, Lalonde DH. Randomized comparison of the single-injection volar subcutaneous block and the two-injection dorsal block for digital anesthesia. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;118:1195–200. - PubMed
  15.  
    1. Cannon B, Chan L, Rowlinson JS, Baker M, Clancy M. Digital anaesthesia: One injection or two? Emerg Med J. 2010;27:533–6. - PubMed
  16.  
    1. Hung VS, Bodavula VK, Dubin NH. Digital anaesthesia: Comparison of the efficacy and pain associated with three digital nerve block techniques. J Hand Surg Br. 2005;30:581–4. - PubMed
  17.  
    1. Martires KJ, Malbasa CL, Bordeaux JS. A randomized controlled crossover trial: Lidocaine injected at a 90-degree angle causes less pain than lidocaine injected at a 45-degree angle. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2011;65:1231–3. - PubMed
  18.  
    1. Okur OM, Şener A, Kavakli HŞ, Çelik GK, Doğan NÖ, Içme F, et al. Two injection digital block versus single subcutaneous palmar injection block for finger lacerations. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2017;43:863–8. - PubMed
  19.  
    1. Joukhadar N, Lalonde D. How to minimize the pain of local anesthetic injection for wide awake surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2021;9:e3730. - PMC - PubMed
  20.  
    1. Strazar AR, Leynes PG, Lalonde DH. Minimizing the pain of local anesthesia injection. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013;132:675–84. - PubMed
  21.  
    1. Cepeda MS, Tzortzopoulou A, Thackrey M, Hudcova J, Arora Gandhi P, Schumann R. Adjusting the pH of lidocaine for reducing pain on injection. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;12:CD006581. - PubMed
  22.  
    1. McKay W, Morris R, Mushlin P. Sodium bicarbonate attenuates pain on skin infiltration with lidocaine, with or without epinephrine. Anesth Analg. 1987;66:572–4. - PubMed
  23.  
    1. Arendt-Nielsen L, Egekvist H, Bjerring P. Pain following controlled cutaneous insertion of needles with different diameters. Somatosens Mot Res. 2006;23:37–43. - PubMed
  24.  
    1. Hogan ME, vanderVaart S, Perampaladas K, Machado M, Einarson TR, Taddio A. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the effect of warming local anesthetics on injection pain. Ann Emerg Med. 2011;58:86–98.e1. - PubMed
  25.  
    1. Cousins MJ, Bridenbaugh PO, editors. Neural Blockade in Clinical Anesthesia and Pain Medicine. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2009. pp. 94–100.
  26.  
    1. Roberts JR, Hedges JR, editors. Section V: Anesthetic and Analgesic Techniques. Philadelphia: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2014. Clinical Procedures in Emergency Medicine; p. 530.

Page Navigation