18F-sodium fluoride bone PET-CT in symptomatic lumbosacral transitional vertebra
Affiliations
Affiliations
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Kuwait Cancer Control Centre, Kuwait; Jaber Al-Ahmad Molecular Imaging Center, Kuwait. Electronic address: dr_shajji@yahoo.com.
- Jack Brignall PET/CT Centre, Castle Hill Hospital, Cottingham, UK.
- Jaber Al-Ahmad Molecular Imaging Center, Kuwait.
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Kuwait Cancer Control Centre, Kuwait.
- Royal Free Hospital NHS Trust, London, UK.
- Antwerp University Hospital, Antwer, Belgium.
Abstract
Aim: To analyse the relationship between 18F-labelled sodium fluoride (NaF) uptake and lumbar back pain in patients with lumbosacral transitional vertebra (LSTV) a congenital malformation of the lumbosacral spine.
Materials and methods: The study population comprised 55 patients (mean age, 51.42 years; median age 52 years) with LSTV. All patients underwent integrated positron-emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) by injecting 0.06 mCi/kg of 18F-NaF. A three-point grading system was used to evaluate 18F-NaF uptake (grade 0, no uptake; grade 1, mild uptake; and grade 2, marked increase uptake.
Results: In total, 55 cases of LSTV (34 symptomatic and 21 asymptomatic) were included. Asymptomatic patients had no uptake in the majority of cases, i.e., grade 0 (n=18) and grade 1 (n=3), whereas symptomatic patients demonstrated focal increase tracer uptake of grade 2 (n=24), grade 1 (n=4), and grade 0 (n=6). There is a strong linear trend between the intensity of 18F-NaF uptake and presence of symptoms (p<0.0001). The sensitivity and specificity of 18F-NaF uptake at LSTV as a cause of pain were 82% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 65-93%) and 86% (95% CI: 64-97%). The positive and negative predictive values were 90% (95% CI: 74-98%) and 75% (95% CI: 53-90%).
Conclusions: 18F-NaF PET/CT can be useful in evaluating back pain and 18F-NaF may be used as an adjunctive biological maker for assessing LSTV as a potential cause of pain.
Similar articles
Seo JH, Lee SM, Yu SN, Lee JW, Lee JE.Rev Esp Med Nucl Imagen Mol (Engl Ed). 2019 Jul-Aug;38(4):238-242. doi: 10.1016/j.remn.2018.09.009. Epub 2019 Jan 18.PMID: 30665751 English, Spanish.
Usmani S, Marafi F, Esmail A, Ahmed N.Br J Radiol. 2018 Apr;91(1084):20170741. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20170741. Epub 2018 Jan 12.PMID: 29293370 Free PMC article.
Yeung S, Toor A, Deib G, Zhang J, Besier T, Fernandez J.Comput Biol Med. 2020 Jan;116:103529. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2019.103529. Epub 2019 Nov 3.PMID: 31715382
Usmani S, Ahmed N, Muzaffar S, Marafi F, Esmail A, Gnanasegaran G, Van den Wyngaert T.Hell J Nucl Med. 2020 Jan-Apr;23(1):67-75. doi: 10.1967/s002449912017.PMID: 32361718 Review.
Sarikaya I, Elgazzar AH, Sarikaya A, Alfeeli M.Nucl Med Commun. 2017 Oct;38(10):810-819. doi: 10.1097/MNM.0000000000000720.PMID: 28777220 Review.
Cited by
50th anniversary of computed tomography: past and future applications in clinical neuroscience.
Dillon WP.J Med Imaging (Bellingham). 2021 Sep;8(5):052112. doi: 10.1117/1.JMI.8.5.052112. Epub 2021 Oct 18.PMID: 34676278 Free PMC article.