Kuwait experience in laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: first 80 cases

Affiliations


Abstract

Introduction: Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (LDN) has been adopted rapidly as it offers less postoperative pain, early recovery, and better cosmetic results compared with the open approach. This prospective study investigated the results of the first 80 LDN performed between May 2005 and May 2006, with regard to donor morbidity and effect on graft function.

Patients and methods: LDN was attempted in 80 donors by one surgical team. Donors included 68 men and 12 women, ages 22 to 53 years, with body mass indices of 17.9 to 42.4. According to computed tomographic angiography, left nephrectomy was planned in 75 donors and right nephrectomy in 5.

Results: LDN was completed successfully in 74 (92.5%) and converted to open in 6 (7.5%) secondary to technical difficulties and operative bleeding. The mean operating time for LDN was 186.16 minutes (range, 95-260 minutes). Mean warm ischemia time (WIT) was 5.7 minutes (range 2-16 minutes). Mean hospital stay was 5.28 days (range, 3-14 days). Two donors (2.5%) were reexplored for postoperative bleeding. Renal function in all donors was satisfactory within 3 months of surgery. Immediate diuresis occurred in 76 (95%) recipients. Acute cellular rejection was diagnosed in 1 recipient. No association was observed between WIT, graft function, development of acute tubular necrosis (ATN), or rejection. Plasma creatinine normalization was clearly associated with donor age.

Conclusions: LDN was found to be a safe procedure with low postoperative morbidity and short recovery time for donors. It can potentially increase the donor pool.


Similar articles

The first decade of a laparoscopic donor nephrectomy program: effect of surgeon and institution experience with 512 cases from 1996 to 2006.

Chin EH, Hazzan D, Edye M, Wisnivesky JP, Herron DM, Ames SA, Palese M, Pomp A, Gagner M, Bromberg JS.J Am Coll Surg. 2009 Jul;209(1):106-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2009.02.060. Epub 2009 May 1.PMID: 19651070

Warm ischemic time during laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy: effects on graft function.

Soulsby RE, Evans LJ, Rigg KM, Shehata M.Transplant Proc. 2005 Mar;37(2):620-2. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2004.12.209.PMID: 15848476

Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: single-center experience in Egypt with 400 consecutive cases.

Fettouh HA, Raouf HA, Shenoufy A, El Feel A, Agabo H, Hakim AA, Fettouh IA.Transplant Proc. 2007 May;39(4):807-10. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2007.03.080.PMID: 17524817

Hand-assisted retroperitoneoscopic nephrectomy for living kidney transplantation: initial 44 cases.

Tsuchiya N, Iinuma M, Habuchi T, Ohyama C, Matsuura S, Sato K, Satoh S, Kato T.Urology. 2004 Aug;64(2):250-4. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2004.03.043.PMID: 15302472 Review.

Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy--an Iranian model for developing countries: a cost-effective no-rush approach.

Simforoosh N, Basiri A, Tabibi A, Shakhssalim N.Exp Clin Transplant. 2004 Dec;2(2):249-53.PMID: 15859937 Review.


Cited by

Introduction of Laparoscopic Donor Nephrectomy: Challenges, Outcomes and Success Strategies.

Saifee Y, Bhatia S, Chamania CS, Salgia P, Kriplani J, Sepaha A.Int J Organ Transplant Med. 2021;12(1):23-31.PMID: 34987730 Free PMC article.

Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: The Middle East experience.

Khauli RB, Traboulsi SL, Medawar W, Abu Dargham R, Abdelnoor AM, Hussein MK.Arab J Urol. 2012 Mar;10(1):46-55. doi: 10.1016/j.aju.2012.01.007. Epub 2012 Mar 9.PMID: 26558004 Free PMC article. Review.


KMEL References