Surgical site infection following cesarean section in a general hospital in Kuwait: trends and risk factors

W Alfouzan 1 2, M Al Fadhli 3, N Abdo 3 4 5, W Alali 6, R Dhar 1

Affiliations

01 October 2019

-

doi: 10.1017/S0950268819001675

Abstract

Surgical site infections (SSI) are a significant cause of post-surgical morbidity and mortality. The objectives of this study were to determine the prevalence of SSI and identify risk factors for infections following cesarean section (CS). A prospective study of SSI after CS was carried out from January 2014 to December 2016 using the methodology of the American National Nosocomial Infection Surveillance System. Suspected SSIs were confirmed clinically by the surgeon, and or, by culture. Seven thousand two hundred thirty five CS were performed with an overall SSI prevalence of 2.1%, increasing from 1.7% in 2014 to 2.95% in 2016 (P = 0.010). Of 152 cases of SSI, the prevalence of infection was 46.7% in women ⩽30 years and 53.3% in women >30 years (P = 0.119). Of 148 culture samples from as many women, 112 (75.7%) yielded growth of microorganisms with 42 (37.5%) of isolates being multi-drug resistant (MDR). Women who did not receive prophylactic antibiotics (35.5%) developed SSI more often than those who did (P < 0.0001). These findings suggest that emergency CS and inappropriate antibiotic prophylaxis are risk factors for developing SSI. In the light of the emergence of MDR bacteria there is a need to implement revised prophylactic antibiotic policy as part of antimicrobial stewardship to decrease SSI rates.

Keywords: Cesarean section; risk factors; surgical site infection; surveillance.

Conflict of interest statement

None.

Similar articles

Surgical site infections after cesarean sections at the University Clinical Center of Kosovo: rates, microbiological profile and risk factors.

Zejnullahu VA, Isjanovska R, Sejfija Z, Zejnullahu VA.BMC Infect Dis. 2019 Aug 28;19(1):752. doi: 10.1186/s12879-019-4383-7.PMID: 31455246 Free PMC article.

Timing of antibiotic prophylaxis in cesarean section: retrospective, difference-in-differences estimation of the effect on surgical-site-infection.

Ben Shoham A, Bar-Meir M, Ioscovich A, Samueloff A, Wiener-Well Y.J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2019 Mar;32(5):804-808. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2017.1391784. Epub 2017 Oct 26.PMID: 29020828

Risk factors for surgical site infection after low transverse cesarean section.

Olsen MA, Butler AM, Willers DM, Devkota P, Gross GA, Fraser VJ.Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2008 Jun;29(6):477-84; discussion 485-6. doi: 10.1086/587810.PMID: 18510455

[Retrospective study of postoperative infectious morbidity following cesarean section].

Di Lieto A, Albano G, Cimmino E, Pontillo M, Gallo F, Micalef R, Paladini A.Minerva Ginecol. 1996 Mar;48(3):85-92.PMID: 8684692 Review. Italian.

Caesarean section, surgical site infection and wound management.

Gould D.Nurs Stand. 2007 Apr 18-24;21(32):57-8, 60, 62 passim. doi: 10.7748/ns2007.04.21.32.57.c4498.PMID: 17479790 Review.

Cited by

Incidence and risk factors for surgical wound complications in women with body mass index >30 kg/m2 following cesarean delivery: a secondary analysis.

Gillespie BM, Ellwood D, Thalib L, Kumar S, Mahomed K, Kang E, Chaboyer W.AJOG Glob Rep. 2022 Jul 4;2(3):100069. doi: 10.1016/j.xagr.2022.100069. eCollection 2022 Aug.PMID: 36276792 Free PMC article.

A study of clinical and economic burden of surgical site infection in patients undergoing caesarian section at a tertiary care teaching hospital in India.

Hirani S, Trivedi NA, Chauhan J, Chauhan Y.PLoS One. 2022 Jun 3;17(6):e0269530. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0269530. eCollection 2022.PMID: 35658054 Free PMC article.

Post-cesarean section surgical site infection and associated factors in East Gojjam zone primary hospitals, Amhara region, North West Ethiopia, 2020.

Bizuayew H, Abebe H, Mullu G, Bewuket L, Tsega D, Alemye T.PLoS One. 2021 Dec 31;16(12):e0261951. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0261951. eCollection 2021.PMID: 34972176 Free PMC article.

Incidence, risk factors and management of post cesarean section surgical site infection (SSI) in a tertiary hospital in Egypt: a five year retrospective study.

Gomaa K, Abdelraheim AR, El Gelany S, Khalifa EM, Yousef AM, Hassan H.BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021 Sep 18;21(1):634. doi: 10.1186/s12884-021-04054-3.PMID: 34537018 Free PMC article.

Post cesarean section surgical site infection and associated factors among women who delivered in public hospitals in Harar city, Eastern Ethiopia: A hospital-based analytic cross-sectional study.

Alemye T, Oljira L, Fekadu G, Mengesha MM.PLoS One. 2021 Jun 23;16(6):e0253194. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0253194. eCollection 2021.PMID: 34161361 Free PMC article.

KMEL References

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/

References

  1.  
    1. Charoenboon C, Srisupundit K and Tongsong T (2013) Rise in cesarean section rate over a 20-year period in a public sector hospital in northern Thailand. Archives of Gynecology & Obstetrics 287, 47–52. - PMC - PubMed
  2.  
    1. World Health Organization (1985) Appropriate technology for birth. Lancet 2, 436–437. - PubMed
  3.  
    1. Vogel JP et al. (2015) New WHO recommendations to improve the outcomes of preterm birth. Lancet Global Health 3, e589–e590. - PubMed
  4.  
    1. Miller ES, Hahn K, Grobman WA and Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine Health Policy Committee (2013) Consequences of a primary elective cesarean delivery across the reproductive life. Obstetrics & Gynecology 121, 789–787. - PubMed
  5.  
    1. Molina G et al. (2015) Relationship between cesarean delivery rate and maternal and neonatal mortality. Journal of the American Medical Association 314, 2263–2270. - PubMed
  6.  
    1. Zuarez-Easton S et al. (2017) Postcesarean wound infection: prevalence, impact, prevention, and management challenges. International Journal of Womens Health 9, 81–88. - PMC - PubMed
  7.  
    1. Lumbiganon P et al. (2010) World Health Organization Global Survey on Maternal and Perinatal Health Research Group. Lancet 375, 490–499. - PubMed
  8.  
    1. Villar J et al. World Health Organization 2005 Global Survey on Maternal and Perinatal Health Research Group (2007) Maternal and neonatal individual risks and benefits associated with caesarean delivery: multicentre prospective study. British Medical Journal 335, 1025. - PMC - PubMed
  9.  
    1. Souza JP et al. WHO Global Survey on Maternal and Perinatal Health Research Group (2010) Caesarean section without medical indications is associated with an increased risk of adverse short-term maternal outcomes: the 2004–2008 WHO global survey on maternal and perinatal health. BMC Medicine 8, 71. - PMC - PubMed
  10.  
    1. Lindquist SAI et al. (2017) Association of previous cesarean delivery with surgical complications after a hysterectomy later in life. JAMA Surgery 152, 1148–1155. - PMC - PubMed
  11.  
    1. Olsen MA et al. (2008) Risk factors for surgical site infection after low transverse cesarean section. Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology 29, 477–484. - PubMed
  12.  
    1. Schneid-Kofman N et al. (2005) Risk factors for wound infection following cesarean deliveries. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics 90, 10–15. - PubMed
  13.  
    1. Opøien HK et al. (2007) Post-cesarean surgical site infections according to CDC standards: rates and risk factors. A prospective cohort study. Acta Obstetrics & Gynecology Scandinavica 86, 1097–1102. - PubMed
  14.  
    1. Center for Disease Control and Prevention (2011) Guidelines for prevention of surgical site infection 1999 (updated May 2011). Available at https://www.cdc.gov/hicpac/SSI/table1-ssi.html.
  15.  
    1. Krieger Y, Walfisch A and Sheiner E (2016) Surgical site infection following cesarean deliveries: trends and risk factors. Journal of Maternal – Fetal and Neonatal Medicine 705, 1–5. - PubMed
  16.  
    1. Wloch C et al. (2012) Risk factors for surgical site infection following caesarean section in England: results from a multicentre cohort study. British Journal of Gynaecology 119, 1324–1333. - PubMed
  17.  
    1. Mangram AJ et al. (1999) Guideline for prevention of surgical site infection, 1999. Centers for disease control and prevention (CDC) hospital infection control practices advisory committee. American Journal of Infection Control 27, 97–132. (updated May 2011). Available at https://www.cdc.gov/hicpac/SSI/table1-ssi.html. - PubMed
  18.  
    1. Ward VP et al. (2008) Enhanced surgical site infection surveillance following caesarean section: experience of a multicentre collaborative post-discharge system. Journal of Hospital Infection 70, 166–173. - PubMed
  19.  
    1. Barbut F et al. (2004) Surgical site infections after cesarean section: results of a five-year prospective surveillance. Journal of Gynecology Obstetrics & Biology of Reproduction (Paris) 33, 487–496. - PubMed
  20.  
    1. Mitt P et al. (2005) Surgical-site infections following cesarean section in an Estonian university hospital: post-discharge surveillance and analysis of risk factors. Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology 26, 449–454. - PubMed
  21.  
    1. Johnson A, Young D and Reilly J (2006) Caesarean section surgical site infection surveillance. Journal of Hospital Infection 64, 30–35. - PubMed
  22.  
    1. Reilly J et al. (2006) Procedure-specific surgical site infection rates and post-discharge surveillance in Scotland. Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology 27, 1318–1323. - PubMed
  23.  
    1. Ferraz EM et al. (1995) Post-discharge surveillance for nosocomial wound infection: does judicious monitoring find cases? American Journal of Infection Control 23, 290–294. - PubMed
  24.  
    1. Chu K, Maine R and Trelles M (2015) Cesarean section surgical site infections in Sub-Saharan Africa: a multi-country study from Medecins Sans Frontieres. World Journal of Surgery 39, 350–355. - PMC - PubMed
  25.  
    1. Ferraro F et al. Centro di Riferimento per le Infezioni associate alle Pratiche Assistenziali Latium Region Group (2016) Surgical site infection after caesarean section: space for post-discharge surveillance improvements and reliable comparisons. New Microbiology 39, 134–138. - PubMed
  26.  
    1. Cardoso Del Monte MC and Pinto Neto AM (2010) Postdischarge surveillance following cesarean section: the incidence of surgical site infection and associated factors. American Journal of Infection Control 38, 467–472. - PubMed
  27.  
    1. Kao LS et al. (2011) Reliability of superficial surgical site infections as a hospital quality measure. Journal of the American College of Surgery 213, 231–235. - PMC - PubMed
  28.  
    1. Ming DY et al. (2012) The impact of depth of infection and post-discharge surveillance on rate of surgical-site infections in a network of community hospitals. Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology 33, 276–282. - PMC - PubMed
  29.  
    1. Koek MB et al. (2015) Post-discharge surveillance (PDS) for surgical site infections: a good method is more important than a long duration. EuroSurveillance 20(8), pii: 21042. - PubMed
  30.  
    1. Couto RC et al. (1998) Post-discharge surveillance and infection rates in obstetric patients. International Journal of Gynaecology & Obstetrics 61, 227–231. - PubMed
  31.  
    1. Petherick ES et al. (2006) Methods for identifying surgical wound infection after discharge from hospital: a systematic review. BMC Infectious Diseases 6, 170. - PMC - PubMed
  32.  
    1. Whitby M et al. (2002) Post-discharge surveillance: can patients reliably diagnose surgical wound infections? Journal of Hospital Infection 52, 155–160. - PubMed
  33.  
    1. Dhar H et al. (2014) A study of post-caesarean section wound infections in a regional referral hospital, Oman. Sultan Qaboos University Medical Journal 14, e211–e217. - PMC - PubMed
  34.  
    1. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (2010) ACOG committee opinion no 465: antimicrobial prophylaxis for cesarean delivery: timing of administration. Obstetrics & Gynecology 116, 791–792. - PubMed
  35.  
    1. Berríos-Torres SI et al. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2017) Guideline for the prevention of surgical site infection. Journal of the American Medical Association, Surgery 152, 784–791. - PubMed
  36.  
    1. Smaill Fiona M and Grivell RM (2014) Antibiotic prophylaxis versus no prophylaxis for preventing infection after cesarean section. Cochrane Database Systematic Reviews 10, CD007482. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007482.pub3. - DOI - PubMed
  37.  
    1. Bratzler DW et al. (2013) Clinical practice guidelines for antimicrobial prophylaxis in surgery. American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy 70, 195–283. - PubMed
  38.  
    1. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (2011) ACOG practice bulletin no 120: use of prophylactic antibiotics in labor and delivery. Obstetrics & Gynecology 117, 1472–1483. - PubMed
  39.  
    1. Assawapalanggool S et al. (2018) The efficacy of ampicillin compared with ceftriaxone on preventing cesarean surgical site infections: an observational prospective cohort study. Antimicrobial Resistance & Infection Control 7, 13–22. - PMC - PubMed
  40.  
    1. Mackeen AD et al. (2014) Suture compared with staple skin closure after cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial. Obstetrics & Gynecology 123, 1169–1175. - PubMed
  41.  
    1. Kasatpibal N, Jamulitrat S and Chongsuvivatwong V (2005) Standardized incidence rates of surgical site infection: a multicenter study in Thailand. American Journal of Infection Control 33, 587–594. - PubMed
  42.  
    1. Iyoke CA et al. (2014) Risks associated with subsequent pregnancy after one caesarean section: a prospective cohort study in a Nigerian obstetric population. Nigerian Journal of Clinical Practice 17, 442–448. - PubMed

Page Navigation