Emergency medicine in the Persian Gulf War--Part 3: Battlefield casualtie
Affiliations
Affiliations
Department of Surgery, University of Hawaii, John A Burns School of Medicine, Kapiolani Medical Center, Honolulu.
Abstract
Study objective: To report the type and frequency of battlefield casualties and the procedures performed to treat them.
Study design: A prospective analysis of trauma record data incorporating anatomic categories and the Revised Trauma Score.
Setting: Two military field trauma centers during the primary ground assault into Kuwait.
Type of participants: Four hundred two trauma admissions of coalition and enemy forces.
Main results: Forty-eight percent of casualties suffered fragmentation wounds, including 43 land mine injuries. Only 10% sustained gunshot wounds. Forty-four percent of casualties had injuries limited to the extremities; 29% had combined extremity injury and injury to another anatomic region. Extremity wounds occurred nearly twice as frequently in the lower extremities as in the upper extremities. Surgical procedures were undertaken in 164 patients, with 108 debridements for major soft tissue injuries or open fractures.
Conclusion: The composite casualty admitted to US Navy-Marine trauma facilities was injured by shrapnel in the lower extremity and required surgical debridement only. Soldiers with land mine injuries, as in other wars, were among those in greatest need of emergency resuscitation.
Similar articles
Emergency medicine in the Persian Gulf War--Part 2. Triage methodology and lessons learned.
Burkle FM Jr, Newland C, Orebaugh S, Blood CG.Ann Emerg Med. 1994 Apr;23(4):748-54. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(94)70310-8.PMID: 8161043
Peoples GE, Gerlinger T, Craig R, Burlingame B.Mil Med. 2005 Jun;170(6):462-8. doi: 10.7205/milmed.170.6.462.PMID: 16001592
Montgomery SP, Swiecki CW, Shriver CD.J Am Coll Surg. 2005 Jul;201(1):7-12; discussion 12-3. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2005.03.038.PMID: 15978435
A US military Role 2 forward surgical team database study of combat mortality in Afghanistan.
Kotwal RS, Staudt AM, Mazuchowski EL, Gurney JM, Shackelford SA, Butler FK, Stockinger ZT, Holcomb JB, Nessen SC, Mann-Salinas EA.J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2018 Sep;85(3):603-612. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000001997.PMID: 29851907 Review.
Trauma and military applications of blood substitutes.
Bowersox JC, Hess JR.Artif Cells Blood Substit Immobil Biotechnol. 1994;22(2):145-57. doi: 10.3109/10731199409117410.PMID: 8087238 Review.
Cited by
Dootz F, von Stackelberg OM, Abaya J, Jacobi C, Mohs C, Craemer EM, Rangger C, Meyding-Lamadé U, Lamadé EK.Neurol Res Pract. 2021 Jul 5;3(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s42466-021-00134-z.PMID: 34218812 Free PMC article.
Khorram-Manesh A, Goniewicz K, Burkle FM, Robinson Y.Mil Med. 2022 Mar 28;187(3-4):e313-e321. doi: 10.1093/milmed/usab108.PMID: 33742659 Free PMC article. Review.