Radiation dose in pelvic imaging
Affiliations
Affiliations
- Radiologic Sciences Department, Kuwait University Faculty of Allied Health Sciences.
Abstract
Objective: To compare the radiation dose during pelvic x-ray examinations using computed radiography (CR) and film-screen (FS) radiography at various x-ray tube voltages (kV) and tube-current time product (mAs) values.
Methods: A pelvic phantom was imaged using FS and CR systems. The entrance surface dose was measured using an ionization chamber, and the gonadal dose and effective dose were calculated using the XDOSE program. The diagnostic quality of the images was assessed using a 5-point subjective scoring system.
Results: At standard kV values, the image quality did not vary significantly between the CR and the FS system, but at higher kV values, the CR images werefound to be of better quality than FS images. In addition, the lower limit of entrance skin dose consistent with diagnostically acceptable CR images was 50% lower than that for FS images.
Conclusion: The gonadal dose and effective dose for pelvic x-ray examinations can be reduced by 50% when CR systems are used and appropriate exposure factors are established.
Similar articles
Optimisation of image plate radiography with respect to tube voltage.
Tingberg A, Sjöström D.Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2005;114(1-3):286-93. doi: 10.1093/rpd/nch536.PMID: 15933123
Brindhaban A, Al Khalifah K, Al Wathiqi G, Al Ostath H.Australas Phys Eng Sci Med. 2005 Dec;28(4):216-22. doi: 10.1007/BF03178721.PMID: 16506618
Investigation of optimum energies for chest imaging using film-screen and computed radiography.
Honey ID, Mackenzie A, Evans DS.Br J Radiol. 2005 May;78(929):422-7. doi: 10.1259/bjr/32912696.PMID: 15845936
Matsumoto M.Igaku Butsuri. 2002;22(2):110-7.PMID: 12766288 Review. Japanese.
State of the art low-dose CT angiography of the body.
Alkadhi H, Schindera ST.Eur J Radiol. 2011 Oct;80(1):36-40. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2010.12.099. Epub 2011 Feb 16.PMID: 21330084 Review.
Cited by
Inverted C-arm Orientation During Simulated Hip Arthroscopic Surgery.
Nadig N, Shaw KA, Mottern E, Bojescul J, Mueller T.Orthop J Sports Med. 2018 Oct 15;6(10):2325967118801275. doi: 10.1177/2325967118801275. eCollection 2018 Oct.PMID: 30349840 Free PMC article.