Test-enhanced learning and its effect on comprehension and diagnostic accuracy
Affiliations
Affiliations
- Discipline of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; The Wilson Centre, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Department of Diagnostic Sciences, Faculty of Dentistry, Kuwait University, Kuwait.
Abstract
Context: In health professions education, tests have traditionally been used to assess the skills and knowledge of learners. More recently, research in psychology and education has shown that tests can also be used to enhance student memory; a phenomenon called the 'testing effect'. Much of the research in this domain has focused on enhancing rote memory of simple facts, and not on the deeper comprehension and application of complex theoretical knowledge necessary to diagnose and manage patients. The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of testing on students' comprehension of the basic science mechanisms and diagnostic accuracy.
Methods: Undergraduate dental and dental hygiene students (n = 112) were taught the radiographic features and pathophysiology underlying four intrabony abnormalities. Participants were divided into two groups: the test-enhanced (TE) condition and the study (ST) condition. Following the learning phase, the TE condition group completed an interventional test that tested the basic science mechanisms and the ST condition group was given additional study passages without being tested. Participants in both groups then completed a diagnostic test and a memory test immediately after the learning phase and 1 week later.
Results: A main effect of testing condition was found. The participants in the TE condition group outperformed those in the ST condition group on immediate and delayed testing. Unlike the diagnostic test, the memory test showed no difference between the groups.
Conclusion: The inclusion of the basic science test appears to have improved the students' understanding of the underlying disease mechanisms learned and also improved their performance on a test of diagnostic accuracy.
Similar articles
Baghdady MT, Carnahan H, Lam EW, Woods NN.J Dent Educ. 2014 Sep;78(9):1279-85.PMID: 25179924 Clinical Trial.
Integration of basic sciences and clinical sciences in oral radiology education for dental students.
Baghdady MT, Carnahan H, Lam EW, Woods NN.J Dent Educ. 2013 Jun;77(6):757-63.PMID: 23740912 Clinical Trial.
The role of basic sciences in diagnostic oral radiology.
Baghdady MT, Pharoah MJ, Regehr G, Lam EW, Woods NN.J Dent Educ. 2009 Oct;73(10):1187-93.PMID: 19805783 Clinical Trial.
Primer on preclinical instruction and evaluation.
Hauser AM, Bowen DM.J Dent Educ. 2009 Mar;73(3):390-8.PMID: 19289728 Review.
Student perceptions of an online dental terminology course.
Grimes EB.J Dent Educ. 2002 Jan;66(1):100-7.PMID: 12358096 Review.
Cited by
Seagrave MP, Foster-Johnson L, Waits JB, Margo K, Leong SL.Med Sci Educ. 2022 Aug 4;32(5):985-993. doi: 10.1007/s40670-022-01568-z. eCollection 2022 Oct.PMID: 36276775 Free PMC article.
Morrison C, Wise J, Maranki M, Ross L.Med Sci Educ. 2021 Apr 22;31(2):607-613. doi: 10.1007/s40670-021-01230-0. eCollection 2021 Apr.PMID: 34457915 Free PMC article.
Xu H, Ang BWG, Soh JY, Ponnamperuma GG.J Gen Intern Med. 2021 Sep;36(9):2745-2754. doi: 10.1007/s11606-021-06916-0. Epub 2021 Jun 22.PMID: 34159542 Free PMC article.
Zain RB, Pateel DGS, Ramanathan A, Kallarakkal TG, Wong GR, Yang YH, Zaini ZM, Ibrahim N, Kohli S, Durward C.J Cancer Educ. 2022 Apr;37(2):319-327. doi: 10.1007/s13187-020-01814-1.PMID: 32821988
Potter JF, Kleiman AM, Myers EG, Herberg TJ, Bechtel AJ, Forkin KT, Dunn LK, Collins SR, Huffmyer JL, Shilling AM, Nemergut EC.J Educ Perioper Med. 2019 Apr 1;21(2):E623. eCollection 2019 Apr-Jun.PMID: 31988984 Free PMC article.