Effectiveness of radiographs and computed tomography in evaluating primary elbow osteoarthritis
Affiliations
Affiliations
- Division of Sports Medicine, Al-Razi Orthopaedic Hospital, Ministry of Health, Kuwait City, Kuwait.
- CHU de Québec-Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada.
- Department of Orthopadic Surgery, King Fahad Hospital of the University, Imam AbdulRahman Bin Faisal University, Al-Khobar, Saudi Arabia.
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, The Moncton Hospital, Moncton, NB, Canada.
- The Roth|McFarlane Hand and Upper Limb Centre, St. Joseph's Health Care, London, ON, Canada.
- The Roth|McFarlane Hand and Upper Limb Centre, St. Joseph's Health Care, London, ON, Canada. Electronic address: kjfaber@uwo.ca.
Abstract
Background: Preoperative radiographic assessment of osteophyte and loose body locations is critical in planning an arthroscopic débridement for primary elbow osteoarthritis. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of radiographs and computed tomography (CT) in localizing osteophytes and loose bodies.
Methods: A consecutive series of 36 patients with primary elbow osteoarthritis was investigated with radiographs and multiaxial 2-dimensional CT prior to elbow arthroscopy. The location of osteophytes and loose bodies was assessed in 9 anatomic locations by 2 fellowship-trained upper extremity surgeons. The diagnostic effectiveness of both imaging modalities was evaluated by calculating the sensitivity and specificity and compared to the gold standard of elbow arthroscopy. Inter- and intrarater percentage agreement between the observations was calculated using Kappa score.
Results: The mean sensitivity for detecting osteophytes in the 9 different anatomic locations was 46% with radiographs and 98% with CT, whereas the mean specificity was 66% and 21% for radiographs and CT, respectively. The mean sensitivity and specificity for loose body detection with radiography were 49% and 89%, respectively, whereas CT had a mean sensitivity of 98% and specificity of 47%. The overall inter-rater percentage agreement between the surgeons in detecting osteophytes and loose bodies on radiographs was 80% and 85%, respectively, whereas on CT it was 95% for detecting osteophytes and 91% for loose bodies.
Conclusion: CT has greater sensitivity than radiographs for the detection of osteophytes and loose bodies in primary elbow osteoarthritis. The lower specificity of CT may be due to this imaging modality's ability to detect small osteophytes and loose bodies that may not be readily identified during elbow arthroscopy. Radiographs have an inferior inter-rater percentage agreement compared with CT. CT is a valuable preoperative investigation to assist surgeons in identifying the location of osteophytes and loose bodies in patients undergoing surgery for primary elbow osteoarthritis.
Keywords: Elbow; elbow arthroscopy; loose bodies; osteoarthritis; osteophytes; radiographic evaluation.
Similar articles
Can preoperative imaging predict the outcomes after arthroscopic release for elbow arthritis?
Lenoir H, Carlier Y, Ferrand M, Vidil A, Desmoineaux P; French Arthroscopic Society.Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2019 Dec;105(8S):S229-S234. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2019.09.012. Epub 2019 Sep 25.PMID: 31563416
Elbow stiffness: effectiveness of conventional radiography and CT to explain osseous causes.
Zubler V, Saupe N, Jost B, Pfirrmann CW, Hodler J, Zanetti M.AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010 Jun;194(6):W515-20. doi: 10.2214/AJR.09.3741.PMID: 20489071
Wagner K, Griffon DJ, Thomas MW, Schaeffer DJ, Schulz K, Samii VF, Necas A.Vet Surg. 2007 Oct;36(7):691-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-950X.2007.00322.x.PMID: 17894596
Hansen B, Beck C, Townsley R.Arthroscopy. 2003 Mar;19(3):E25. doi: 10.1053/jars.2003.50076.PMID: 12627142 Review.
Arthroscopic Management of Elbow Osteoarthritis.
Kroonen LT, Piper SL, Ghatan AC.J Hand Surg Am. 2017 Aug;42(8):640-650. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2017.05.023. Epub 2017 Jun 28.PMID: 28666671 Review.
Cited by
Donecker J, Lattimer JC, Gaschen L, Aulakh KS.Vet Med (Auckl). 2021 Dec 17;12:325-335. doi: 10.2147/VMRR.S345144. eCollection 2021.PMID: 34950571 Free PMC article.