Initiating a National Mammographic Screening Program: The Kuwait Experience Training With a US Cancer Center

Affiliations

01 February 2019

-

doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2018.07.025


Abstract

Purpose:: To train Kuwait radiologists and technologists in breast imaging to create a Kuwait national mammography screening program (KNMSP) that provides high quality safe mammography services meeting international standards for early detection of small invasive breast cancers in asymptomatic women.

Materials and Methods:: 5 radiologists, 6 technologists and 1 physicist/radiation protection technologist from Kuwait trained at x hospital over a 3 year period utilizing Society of Breast Imaging/American College of Radiology guidelines and Food and Drug Administration Mammography Quality Standards Act requirements for education program content. On site visits in Kuwait were provided by x hospital radiologists and technologists 3 times during the program. The KNMSP was implemented to provide asymptomatic women ages 40–69 screening mammography services. A lead Kuwaiti breast radiologist collected and analyzed mammography results and outcome data utilizing descriptive statistics.

Results:: 6933/164000 (4.2%) Kuwaiti women were screened with 83 cancers detected, 74 invasive and 9 ductal carcinoma in situ. Screening mammography sensitivity was 97.6%, specificity 88.2%, and PPV3 37.1%. Diagnosis was stage 0 in 9/83 (10.8%), Stage 1 in 24/83(28.9%), Stage 2 in 34/83 (41%), Stage 3 in 11/83 (13.3%) and Stage 4 in 5/83 (6.0%). 80% of women with breast cancer were diagnosed with tissue biopsy within 4 weeks of their screening mammogram.

Conclusion:: The KNMSP demonstrates the successful training of Kuwait radiologists and mammography technologists with implementation of a national screening mammography program in Kuwait with acceptable sensitivity and specificity and timely diagnosis of early stage breast cancers.


Figures


Similar articles

Kuwait National Mammography Screening Program: outcomes of 5 years of screening in Kuwaiti women.

Alkhawari HA, Asbeutah AM, Almajran AA, AlKandari LA.Ann Saudi Med. 2021 Sep-Oct;41(5):257-267. doi: 10.5144/0256-4947.2021.257. Epub 2021 Oct 7.PMID: 34618610 Free PMC article.

How the USPSTF's Mammographic Screening Guidelines Should Be Interpreted.

Prasad V.Am J Med. 2017 Jul;130(7):769-770. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2017.02.021. Epub 2017 Mar 24.PMID: 28344145 No abstract available.

Organised mammographic screening--more benefits than harms.

Hofvind S.Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2013 Mar 19;133(6):619-20. doi: 10.4045/tidsskr.12.0911.PMID: 23552154 English, Norwegian. No abstract available.

Harmonizing Breast Cancer Screening Recommendations: Metrics and Accountability.

Lee CS, Moy L, Friedewald SM, Sickles EA, Monticciolo DL.AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2018 Feb;210(2):241-245. doi: 10.2214/AJR.17.18704. Epub 2017 Oct 18.PMID: 29045178 Review.

Screening Mammography in Women 40-49 Years Old: Current Evidence.

Ray KM, Joe BN, Freimanis RI, Sickles EA, Hendrick RE.AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2018 Feb;210(2):264-270. doi: 10.2214/AJR.17.18707. Epub 2017 Oct 24.PMID: 29064760 Review.


References

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/