The Utility of Diagnostic Laparoscopy in Post-Bariatric Surgery Patients with Chronic Abdominal Pain of Unknown Etiology
Affiliations
Affiliations
- Bariatric and Metabolic Institute, Department of General Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Desk M61, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA.
- Department of Surgery & Urology, Al-Sabah Hospital, Ministry of Health, Kuwait, Kuwait.
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand.
- Imaging Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
- Bariatric and Metabolic Institute, Department of General Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Desk M61, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA. aminiaa@ccf.org.
Abstract
Purpose: Chronic abdominal pain after bariatric surgery is associated with diagnostic and therapeutic challenges. The aim of this study was to evaluate the yield of laparoscopy as a diagnostic and therapeutic tool in post-bariatric surgery patients with chronic abdominal pain who had negative imaging and endoscopic studies.
Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed on post-bariatric surgery patients who underwent laparoscopy for diagnosis and treatment of chronic abdominal pain at a single academic center. Only patients with both negative preoperative CT scan and upper endoscopy were included.
Results: Total of 35 post-bariatric surgery patients met the inclusion criteria, and all had history of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Twenty out of 35 patients (57%) had positive findings on diagnostic laparoscopy including presence of adhesions (n = 12), chronic cholecystitis (n = 4), mesenteric defect (n = 2), internal hernia (n = 1), and necrotic omentum (n = 1). Two patients developed post-operative complications including a pelvic abscess and an abdominal wall abscess. Overall, 15 patients (43%) had symptomatic improvement after laparoscopy; 14 of these patients had positive laparoscopic findings requiring intervention (70% of the patients with positive laparoscopy). Conversely, 20 (57%) patients required long-term medical treatment for management of chronic abdominal pain.
Conclusion: Diagnostic laparoscopy, which is a safe procedure, can detect pathological findings in more than half of post-bariatric surgery patients with chronic abdominal pain of unknown etiology. About 40% of patients who undergo diagnostic laparoscopy and 70% of patients with positive findings on laparoscopy experience significant symptom improvement. Patients should be informed that diagnostic laparoscopy is associated with no symptom improvement in about half of cases.
Keywords: Abdominal pain; Adhesion; Bariatric surgery; Complication; Diagnostic laparoscopy; Endoscopy; Gastric bypass; Internal hernia.
Similar articles
Karila-Cohen P, Cuccioli F, Tammaro P, Pelletier AL, Gero D, Marmuse JP, Laissy JP, Arapis K.Obes Surg. 2017 Aug;27(8):1961-1972. doi: 10.1007/s11695-017-2601-1.PMID: 28229318
Diagnosis and treatment of chronic abdominal pain 5 years after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.
Blom-Høgestøl IK, Stubhaug A, Kristinsson JA, Mala T.Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2018 Oct;14(10):1544-1551. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2018.06.004. Epub 2018 Jun 14.PMID: 30449511
Chowbey P, Baijal M, Kantharia NS, Khullar R, Sharma A, Soni V.Obes Surg. 2016 Sep;26(9):2029-2034. doi: 10.1007/s11695-016-2049-8.PMID: 26757920
Zhao J, Samaan JS, Toubat O, Samakar K.J Surg Res. 2020 Aug;252:222-230. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2020.03.013. Epub 2020 Apr 11.PMID: 32289579 Review.
[Acute internal hernia following gastric bypass for morbid obesity].
Mala T, Kristinsson J.Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2013 Mar 19;133(6):640-4. doi: 10.4045/tidsskr.12.1113.PMID: 23552158 Review. Norwegian.
References
-
- Arch Surg. 2007 Oct;142(10):942-6 - PubMed
-
- Obes Surg. 2009 May;19(5):549-52 - PubMed
-
- Ann Surg. 2016 Oct;264(4):674-81 - PubMed
-
- Obes Surg. 2015 Apr;25(4):615-21 - PubMed
-
- Obes Surg. 2002 Feb;12(1):39-48 - PubMed
-
- World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2014 Dec 16;6(12):625-9 - PubMed
-
- Obes Surg. 2015 Apr;25(4):622-7 - PubMed
-
- Br J Clin Pract. 1974 May;28(5):163-5 - PubMed
-
- J Clin Gastroenterol. 2005 Feb;39(2):110-4 - PubMed
-
- Surgery. 2003 Oct;134(4):549-52; discussion 552-4 - PubMed
-
- Am J Surg. 1989 May;157(5):490-3 - PubMed
-
- Obes Surg. 2017 May;27(5):1309-1315 - PubMed
-
- Surg Endosc. 1996 Nov;10(11):1085-7 - PubMed
-
- Obes Surg. 2006 Oct;16(10):1265-71 - PubMed
-
- Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2014 Jul-Aug;10(4):666-70 - PubMed
-
- Obes Surg. 2003 Jun;13(3):350-4 - PubMed
-
- Obes Surg. 2015 Nov;25(11):2106-11 - PubMed
-
- Surg Endosc. 1998 Jul;12(7):911-4 - PubMed
-
- Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2007 Jan-Feb;3(1):21-4 - PubMed
-
- Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2015 Jul-Aug;11(4):978-9 - PubMed
-
- Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2015 Jul-Aug;11(4):758-64 - PubMed
-
- Obes Surg. 2003 Feb;13(1):62-5 - PubMed
-
- Trop Gastroenterol. 2013 Jul-Sep;34(3):170-3 - PubMed
-
- Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2008 May-Jun;4(3):394-8; discussion 398 - PubMed
-
- Obes Surg. 2011 Feb;21(2):253-63 - PubMed
-
- Sao Paulo Med J. 2016 Jan-Feb;134(1):70-3 - PubMed
-
- Am Surg. 2016 Sep;82(9):238-9 - PubMed