A Comparative Study Utilizing the Voice Handicap Index-10 (VHI-10) in Teachers and the General Population of Kuwait

Affiliations


Abstract

Objectives: The objective of this study was to determine the prevalence of voice handicap perception of teachers in Kuwait and compare them within the general population by using the validated Arabic version of the voice handicap index-10 (VHI-10). Moreover, we explored variations within the teaching profession itself with regards to specific characteristics.

Methods: The study was a cross-sectional survey design, in which participants from all governates of Kuwait (1820 teachers and 755 controls) completed the validated Arabic VHI-10, health-related, and demographic questions. The questionnaires were distributed among a random sample of elementary, middle, and high school teachers of both genders, and a random sample of the control population.

Results: The mean VHI-10 of teachers was significantly higher than nonteachers (mean VHI-10 of teachers = 5.7, mean VHI-10 of nonteachers = 3.7, P < 0.001). Furthermore, there was a significant difference between teachers and controls in those who scored >11 in the VHI-10 (>11 = 17.6%, 10.2% respectively, P = <0.001). Female teachers scored a higher mean VHI-10 than male teachers (B = 0.66, P < 0.001). There was no difference in the mean VHI-10 among the different teaching class levels. However, elementary school teachers were the most group to exceed the cut-off point (VHI-10 >11) (Odds Ratio = 1.38, P = 0.04). With regards to smoking, we found no difference in the mean VHI-10 and scoring >11 in the questionnaire. Art and science teachers had the highest mean VHI-10 (P = 0.005 and 0.03, respectively).

Conclusion: The results of the study revealed a higher perception of voice handicap in teachers than nonteachers. Therefore, emphasis should be on teachers in order to prevent voice damage.

Keywords: Occupational voice users; Teachers; Voice disorders in teachers; Voice handicap index; Voice handicap index-10; Voice handicap index-10 in teachers.


Similar articles

Kuwaiti Teachers' Perceptions of Voice Handicap.

Albustan SA, Marie BS, Natour YS, Darawsheh WB.J Voice. 2018 May;32(3):319-324. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2017.05.003. Epub 2017 May 30.PMID: 28576335

The voice handicap of student-teachers and risk factors perceived to have a negative influence on the voice.

Thomas G, Kooijman PG, Donders AR, Cremers WR, de Jong FI.J Voice. 2007 May;21(3):325-36. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2005.12.003. Epub 2006 Feb 28.PMID: 16504468

The Effects of a Voice Education Program on VHI Scores of Elementary School Teachers.

Faham M, Ahmadi A, Drinnan M, Saadatmand N, Fatahi E, Jalalipour M.J Voice. 2016 Nov;30(6):755.e1-755.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2015.09.009. Epub 2015 Oct 21.PMID: 26482398 Clinical Trial.

Biopsychosocial impact of voicing and general coping style in teachers.

Van Wijck-Warnaar A, Van Opstal MJ, Exelmans K, Schaekers K, Thomas G, de Jong FI.Folia Phoniatr Logop. 2010;62(1-2):40-6. doi: 10.1159/000239062. Epub 2010 Jan 8.PMID: 20093843

Psychosocial assessment of voice problems among Saudi teachers.

Malki KH, Mesallam TA.J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2012 Jun 1;41(3):189-99.PMID: 22762701


References

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/