Coblation tonsillectomy versus laser tonsillectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Affiliations

01 December 2022

-

doi: 10.1007/s00405-022-07534-0


Abstract

Aim: This systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluated coblation versus laser (carbon dioxide and diode) tonsillectomy, with regard to various surgical and clinical outcomes.

Methods: We searched PubMed, CENTRAL, Scopus, and Web of Science for relevant from inception until March 2021. We evaluated risk of bias using the Cochrane Collaboration Tool. We summarized the outcomes as risk ratio (RR) or mean difference/standardized mean difference (MD/SMD) with 95% confidence interval (CI). We conducted subgroup analysis based on the day of postoperative pain (day 1, day 7, and day 14) and type of postoperative hemorrhage (reactionary and secondary). In addition, we conducted subgroup analysis according to the type of laser.

Results: Five RCTs were analyzed. Three and two RCTs were evaluated as having "some concerns" and "low risk of bias", respectively. Coblation tonsillectomy correlated with lower intraoperative blood loss (MD = -5.08 ml, 95% CI [- 7.33 to - 2.84], P < 0.0001) and lower operative time (MD = - 4.50 min, 95% CI [- 6.10 to - 2.90], P < 0.0001) compared with the laser tonsillectomy. However, there was no significant difference between both groups regarding the postoperative pain score (SMD = - 0.27, 95% CI [- 0.72 to 0.17], P = 0.27) and rate of postoperative hemorrhage (RR = 0.95, 95% CI [0.27-3.40], P = 0.23). Subgroup analysis reported similar insignificant difference between both groups according to the day of postoperative pain and type of postoperative hemorrhage.

Conclusions: Coblation tonsillectomy correlated with a significant reduction in intraoperative blood loss and operative time compared with the laser technique. Nevertheless, these effects do not seem clinically meaningful in surgical practice.

Keywords: Coblation; Hemorrhage; Laser; Pain; Tonsillectomy.


Similar articles

Coblation versus other surgical techniques for tonsillectomy.

Pynnonen M, Brinkmeier JV, Thorne MC, Chong LY, Burton MJ.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Aug 22;8(8):CD004619. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004619.pub3.PMID: 28828761 Free PMC article. Review.

CO2 laser or dissection tonsillectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical outcomes.

Tsikopoulos A, Fountarlis A, Tsikopoulos K, Dilmperis F, Tsikopoulos I, Garefis K, Karkos P, Skoulakis C, Triaridis S.Auris Nasus Larynx. 2023 Feb;50(1):2-16. doi: 10.1016/j.anl.2022.05.002. Epub 2022 May 18.PMID: 35597696 Review.

Adolescents and Adults Undergoing Temperature-Controlled Surgical Instruments vs Electrocautery in Tonsillectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials.

Lee YC, Hsin LJ, Lin WN, Fang TJ, Tsai YT, Luo CM.JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2020 Apr 1;146(4):339-346. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2019.4605.PMID: 32027341 Free PMC article.

The analgesic and anti-haemorrhagic efficacy of platelet-rich plasma in tonsillectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

Albazee E, Diab S, Awad AK, Aboeldahab H, Abdella WS, Abu-Zaid A.Clin Otolaryngol. 2023 Jan;48(1):1-9. doi: 10.1111/coa.13977. Epub 2022 Sep 12.PMID: 36029195 Review.

[The clinical efficacy of coblation tonsillectomy and conventional tonsillectomy in China: A Meta analysis].

Zuo HX, Niu YM, Zhang C, Huang JJ, Wang L, Du SM.Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2018 Feb;32(4):269-278. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.1001-1781.2018.04.007.PMID: 29798503 Chinese.


References

  1.  
    1. Windfuhr JP et al (2016) Clinical practice guideline: tonsillitis II. Surgical management. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 273(4):989–1009 - DOI
  2.  
    1. Pankhania M et al (2021) Tonsillitis, tonsillectomy, and deep neck space infections in England: the case for a new guideline for surgical and non-surgical management. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 103(3):208–217 - DOI
  3.  
    1. Randall DA (2020) Current indications for tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy. J Am Board Fam Med 33(6):1025–1030 - DOI
  4.  
    1. Aldamluji N et al (2021) PROSPECT guideline for tonsillectomy: systematic review and procedure-specific postoperative pain management recommendations. Anaesthesia 76(7):947–961 - DOI
  5.  
    1. Krishna P, Lee D (2001) Post-tonsillectomy bleeding: a meta-analysis. Laryngoscope 111(8):1358–1361 - DOI
  6.  
    1. Ashbach MN, Ostrower ST, Parikh SR (2007) Tonsillectomy techniques and pain: a review of randomized controlled trials and call for standardization. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec 69(6):364–370 - DOI
  7.  
    1. Ahmed J, Arya A (2021) Lasers in tonsillectomy: revisited with systematic review. Ear Nose Throat J 100(1_suppl):14s–18s - DOI
  8.  
    1. Daskalakis D et al (2021) Intracapsular coblation tonsillectomy versus extracapsular coblation tonsillectomy: a systematic review and a meta-analysis. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 278(3):637–644 - DOI
  9.  
    1. Moher D et al (2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med 6(7):e1000097 - DOI
  10.  
    1. Higgins JGS editors. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 [Internet]. The Cochrane Collaboration and A.A.f. www.handbook.cochrane.org . Updated Mar 2011
  11.  
    1. Sterne JAC et al (2019) RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ 366:l4898 - DOI
  12.  
    1. Higgins JP et al (2003) Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ 327(7414):557–560 - DOI
  13.  
    1. Magdy EA et al (2008) Coblation tonsillectomy: a prospective, double-blind, randomised, clinical and histopathological comparison with dissection-ligation, monopolar electrocautery and laser tonsillectomies. J Laryngol Otol 122(3):282–290 - DOI
  14.  
    1. Kim NG et al (2013) Comparison of tonsillectomy by conventional dissection, electrocautery, laser, and coblation. Korean J Otorhinolaryngol-Head Neck Surg 56(12):773–777 - DOI
  15.  
    1. Elbadawey MR et al (2015) A randomised controlled trial of coblation, diode laser and cold dissection in paediatric tonsillectomy. J Laryngol Otol 129(11):1058–1063 - DOI
  16.  
    1. Matin M et al (2017) Coblation versus diode laser tonsillectomy in children: a randomized controlled trial. Bang J Otorhinolaryngol 23(2):140–145 - DOI
  17.  
    1. Alaqeedy AA, Rashid RA, Al-Ani RM (2022) Coblation versus diode laser tonsillectomy: a comparative study. Iran J Otorhinolaryngol 34(2):113–120
  18.  
    1. Timms MS, Temple RH (2002) Coblation tonsillectomy: a double blind randomized controlled study. J Laryngol Otol 116(6):450–452 - DOI
  19.  
    1. Kassab AN et al (2019) Comparative intraindividual ablative tissue effects of diode laser 980 nm versus radiofrequency in tonsillar hypertrophy management. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital 39(3):150–155 - DOI
  20.  
    1. Ahmad MU et al (2020) Coblation versus cold dissection in paediatric tonsillectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Laryngol Otol 134(3):197–204 - DOI
  21.  
    1. Alsaif A et al (2021) Tonsillectomy outcomes for coblation versus bipolar diathermy techniques in adult patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ear Nose Throat J. https://doi.org/10.1177/145561321994995 - DOI
  22.  
    1. Karam M et al (2022) Coblation Versus Bipolar Diathermy Hemostasis in Pediatric Tonsillectomy Patients: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Cureus 14(3):e23066
  23.  
    1. Liu G et al (2020) Plasma ablation vs other hot techniques for tonsillectomy: a meta-analysis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 163(5):860–869 - DOI
  24.  
    1. Egger M et al (1997) Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ 315(7109):629–634 - DOI