Evaluating the success of the tele-pathology system in governmental hospitals in Kuwait: an explanatory sequential mixed methods design

Ali Jasem Buabbas 1, Tareq Mohammad 2, Adel K Ayed 3, Hawraa Mallah 4, Hamza Al-Shawaf 5, Abdulwahed Mohammed Khalfan 6

Affiliations

02 August 2021

-

doi: 10.1186/s12911-021-01567-x

Abstract

Background: Telepathology is the practice of reviewing and exchanging pathological images through telecommunication systems to obtain diagnoses remotely. Studying the factors that make such a system successful and favourable is important to ensure the merits of its implementation in clinical practice.

Objective: This study aims to evaluate the success of a telepathology system from the users' perspectives, using specific evaluation criteria, namely: system quality, information quality, technical service quality, user satisfaction, and benefits.

Methods: A sequential explanatory mixed methods design was adopted in this study, which consists of two phases. Initially, a questionnaire was distributed via WhatsApp to all of the pathologists (total: 45) working at governmental hospitals in Kuwait. Followed by, semi-structured interviews with ten senior pathologists.

Results: Forty pathologists responded to the questionnaire, giving an 89% response rate. There were 42.5% of the respondents aged between 35-44 years old, and 52.5% were male. The quantitative results reveal that most of the respondents were satisfied with the quality of the telepathology system with a mean of 2.6025 (Standard Deviation (SD) = 0.47176), whereas they were dissatisfied with the quality of the information with a mean of 2.4100 (SD = 1.580) and the technical support services with a mean of 2.2750 (SD = 0.99535). In addition, there was disagreement on the benefits of telepathology in clinical practice among the pathologists with a mean of 2.4667 (SD = 0.77552). The qualitative results indicate that the lack of interest in and little experience with using the system were behind the general dissatisfaction of most of the respondents. All of the interviewees were satisfied with the performance of the telepathology system and considered it successful; however, the quality of the technical support services, including training workshops, was deemed deficient.

Conclusion: This study concluded that telepathology system in Kuwait is functioning well and has been successful in its implementation; however, pathologists are dissatisfied with it, mainly due to the deficient quality of the technical support services provided. In addition, the successful implementation of such advanced technologies requires careful steps to be taken on multiple levels: technical, organisational, and managerial. Recommendations were suggested.

Keywords: Attitude; Evaluation; Pathologists; Telepathology system.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Similar articles

Preconceived Stakeholders' Attitude Toward Telepathology: Implications for Successful Implementation.

Gozali E, Safdari R, Sadeghi M, Saeidi MG, Niakan Kalhori SR, Noroozinia F, Fazlollahi ZZ, Rahimi B.J Pathol Inform. 2017 Dec 19;8:50. doi: 10.4103/jpi.jpi_59_17. eCollection 2017.PMID: 29416913 Free PMC article.

Pathologists' acceptance of telepathology in the Ministry of National Guard Health Affairs Hospitals in Saudi Arabia: A survey study.

Alawashiz R, AlDossary SA.Digit Health. 2023 Mar 14;9:20552076231163672. doi: 10.1177/20552076231163672. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec.PMID: 36937697 Free PMC article.

The effects of a regional telepathology project: a study protocol.

Trudel MC, Paré G, Têtu B, Sicotte C.BMC Health Serv Res. 2012 Mar 15;12:64. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-12-64.PMID: 22420301 Free PMC article.

Pathologists' attitudes to implementing telepathology.

Mairinger T, Netzer TT, Schoner W, Gschwendtner A.J Telemed Telecare. 1998;4(1):41-6. doi: 10.1258/1357633981931263.PMID: 9640709

From telepathology to virtual pathology institution: the new world of digital pathology.

Kayser K, Kayser G, Radziszowski D, Oehmann A.Rom J Morphol Embryol. 1999-2004;45:3-9.PMID: 15847374 Review.

Cited by

Doctor for Every Citizen: Telehealth Visits at Dubai Health Authority during COVID-19 Pandemic in Dubai, United Arab Emirates.

Alnakhi WK, Mamdouh H, Hussain HY, Mudawi MS, Ibrahim GM, Al Balushi AJ, Al Zarooni N, Elnaeem A, Natafgi N.Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Jan 18;11(3):294. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11030294.PMID: 36766869 Free PMC article.

References

  1.  
    1. Chai Ling L, Krishnappa P. Telepathology-an update. Int J Collaborat Res Internal Med Public Health. 2012;4:12.
  2.  
    1. Ayyad E. Virtual telepathology in Egypt, applications of WSI in Cairo University. Diagn Pathol. 2011 doi: 10.1186/1746-1596-6-S1S1. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
  3.  
    1. Munabi IGK, Isyagi MM, Royall J, Sewankambo NK. Static telepathology in a rural African hospital setting: a pilot experience by Makerere University Faculty of Medicine. 2008. CATAI 2008.
  4.  
    1. Francis M, Junaid A, Dajani F. Static image telepathology in routine surgical pathology diagnosis: a report on the first experience in the Arab world from Kuwait. Med Principles Pract. 1999;8:255–265. doi: 10.1159/000026102. - DOI
  5.  
    1. Montgomery ND, Tomoka T, Krysiak R, Powers E, Mulenga M, Kampani C, Chimzimu F, Owino MK, Dhungel BM, Gopal S, Fedoriw Y. Practical successes in telepathology experiences in Africa. Clin Lab Med. 2018;38(1):141–150. doi: 10.1016/j.cll.2017.10.011. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
  6.  
    1. Jahn SW, Plass M, Moinfar F. Digital pathology: advantages, limitations and emerging perspectives. J Clin Med. 2020;9(11):3697. doi: 10.3390/jcm9113697. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
  7.  
    1. Sankaye S, Kachewar S. Telepathology for effective healthcare in developing nations. Australas Med J. 2011;4(11):592–595. doi: 10.4066/AMJ.2011.855. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
  8.  
    1. Vyas N, Markow M, Prieto-Granada C, Gaudi S, Turner L, Rodriguez-Waitkus P, Messina J, Jukic D. Comparing whole slide digital images versus traditional glass slides in the detection of common microscopic features seen in dermatitis. J Pathol Inform; 2016, 10.4103/2153-3539.186909 - PMC - PubMed
  9.  
    1. Gozali E, Safdari R, Sadeghi M, Ghazi Saeidi M, Niajan Kalhori S, Noroozinia F, Zare Fazlollahi Z, Rahimi B. Preconceived stakeholders' attitude toward telepathology: implications for successful implementation. J Pathol Inform. 2017;8:50. doi: 10.4103/jpi_59_17. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
  10.  
    1. Trudel M, Pare G, Tetu B, Sicotte C. The effects of a regional telepathology project: a study protocol. BMC Health serv Res. 2012;12:64. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-12-64. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
  11.  
    1. Têtu B, Perron É, Louahlia S, Paré G, Trudel MC, Meyer J. The eastern québec telepathology network: a three-year experience of clinical diagnostic services. Diagn Pathol. 2014;9(1):S1. doi: 10.1186/1746-1596-9-S1-S1. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
  12.  
    1. Pare G, Meyer J, Trudel MC, Tetu B. Impacts of a large decentralized telepathology network in Canada. Telemed J E Health. 2016;22(3):246–250. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2015.0083. - DOI - PubMed
  13.  
    1. Dennis T, Start RD, Cross SS. The use of digital imaging, video conferencing, and telepathology in histopathology: a national survey. J Clin Pathol. 2005;58(3):254–8. doi: 10.1136/jcp.2004.022012. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
  14.  
    1. Bellis M, Metias S, Naugler C, Pollett A, Jothy S, Yousef GM. Digital pathology: Attitudes and practices in the Canadian pathology community. J Pathol Inform. 2013;4:3. doi: 10.4103/2153-3539.108540. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
  15.  
    1. Leica biosystems. Available at https://www.leicabiosystems.com/digital-pathology/scan/. Accessed on 10–5–2021
  16.  
    1. DeLone W, McLean E. The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: a ten-year update. J Manage Inform Syst. 2003;19(4):9–30. doi: 10.1080/07421222.2003.11045748. - DOI
  17.  
    1. Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3:77–101. doi: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa. - DOI
  18.  
    1. Javadi M, Zarea K. Understanding thematic analysis and its pitfall. J Client Care. 2016; 1(1), 34–40. 10.15412/J.JCC.02010107
  19.  
    1. Costello S. Johnston D, Dervan P, O'shea D. Development and evaluation of the virtual pathology slide: a new tool in telepathology; J Med Internet Res. 2013; 5(2): e11. PMID: 12857667. doi: 10.2196/jmir.5.2.e11. - PMC - PubMed
  20.  
    1. Ajami S, Bagheri-Tadi T. Barriers for adopting electronic health records (EHRs) by physicians. Acta Inform Med. 2013;21(2):129–134. doi: 10.5455/aim.2013.21.129-134. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
  21.  
    1. Hanna MG, Reuter VE, Ardon O, et al. Validation of a digital pathology system including remote review during the COVID-19 pandemic. Mod Pathol. 2020;33(11):2115–2127. doi: 10.1038/s41379-020-0601-5. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
  22.  
    1. Farahani N, Pantanowitz L. Overview of telepathology. Clin Lab Med. 2016;36(1):101–112. doi: 10.1016/j.cll.2015.09.010. - DOI - PubMed
  23.  
    1. Meyer J, Pare G. Telepathology impacts and implementations challenges: a scoping review. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2015;139(12):1550–1557. doi: 10.5858/arpa.2014-0606-RA. - DOI - PubMed
  24.  
    1. Buabbas AJ, Al-Shamali DA, Sharma P, Haidar S, Al-Shawaf H. Users' Perspectives on a Picture Archiving and Communication System (PACS): An In-Depth Study in a Teaching Hospital in Kuwait. JMIR Med Inform. 2016;4(2):e21. Published 2016 Jun 15. doi:10.2196/medinform.5703 - PMC - PubMed
  25.  
    1. Chong T, Palma-Diaz MF, Fisher C, et al. The California telepathology service: UCLA's experience in deploying a regional digital pathology subspecialty consultation network. J Pathol Inform. 2019;10:31. doi: 10.4103/jpi.jpi_22_19. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Page Navigation