Multiple perceptions of robotic-assisted surgery among surgeons and patients: a cross-sectional study

Saad A Aldousari 1 2, Ali J Buabbas 3, Said M Yaiesh 4, Rawan J Alyousef 5, Abdullah N Alenezi 5

 

Affiliations

08 January 2021

-

doi: 10.1007/s11701-020-01136-w

Limited data exist regarding knowledge and perceptions of surgeons and patients about robotic-assisted surgery (RAS) in the Middle East. This study aimed to explore perceptions of surgeons and patients about RAS. A questionnaire-based survey was distributed among surgeons of different specialties and patients. Between March and September 2019, 278 and 256 surveys were completed by surgeons and patients, respectively (95.2% and 94.8% response rate, respectively). The surgeons' self-reported experience with technology was related to the level of comfort with computers and computer literacy. Most surgeons have heard of RAS availability, and the majority agreed to its introduction into the healthcare system. However, only 75 (27%) of the surgeons thought that the surgeon has complete control over the robot, and 69 (25%) surgeons were not sure of the level of control the surgeon has over the robot reflecting poor knowledge about this technology. Less than a third of patient respondents have heard of RAS. However, half of them would consider it should they need to undergo surgery. When compared to open surgery, 23 (9%), 26 (10%), and 94 (37%) patient respondents thought that RAS caused less pain, had fewer complications, and was faster than conventional surgery, respectively. Knowledge and perceptions about RAS are limited among surgeons and patients in Kuwait. Efforts should focus on increasing awareness.

Keywords: Knowledge; Perceptions; Robot-assisted surgery; da vinci.

Similar articles

An exploratory study of public' awareness about robotics-assisted surgery in Kuwait.

Buabbas AJ, Aldousari S, Shehab AA.BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2020 Jul 1;20(1):140. doi: 10.1186/s12911-020-01167-1.PMID: 32611407 Free PMC article.

Public perceptions on robotic surgery, hospitals with robots, and surgeons that use them.

Boys JA, Alicuben ET, DeMeester MJ, Worrell SG, Oh DS, Hagen JA, DeMeester SR.Surg Endosc. 2016 Apr;30(4):1310-6. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4368-6. Epub 2015 Jul 15.PMID: 26173543

Online Crowdsourcing to Explore Public Perceptions of Robotic-Assisted Orthopedic Surgery.

Pagani NR, Moverman MA, Puzzitiello RN, Menendez ME, Barnes CL, Kavolus JJ.J Arthroplasty. 2021 Jun;36(6):1887-1894.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2021.02.027. Epub 2021 Feb 15.PMID: 33741241

Robot-assisted urological surgery in the Middle East: Where are we and how far can we go?

Azhar RA, Elkoushy MA, Aldousari S.Arab J Urol. 2019 Apr 23;17(2):106-113. doi: 10.1080/2090598X.2019.1601003. eCollection 2019.PMID: 31285921 Free PMC article. Review.

Patients' Perceptions After Robot-Assisted Surgery: An Integrative Review.

Moloney R, O'Brien B, Coffey JC, Coffey A, Murphy F.AORN J. 2020 Aug;112(2):133-141. doi: 10.1002/aorn.13104.PMID: 32716545 Review.

 

Cited by

Surgeon perception of factors affecting the efficiency of conventional and robotic laparoscopy: A Pan India study.

Kumar P, Rammohan R, Chavan M, Ghyar R, Deshpande S, Kulkarni JN, Bhansali H, Ravi B.Heliyon. 2022 Dec 24;8(12):e12561. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e12561. eCollection 2022 Dec.PMID: 36619437 Free PMC article.

Learning Curves in Pediatric Robot-Assisted Pyeloplasty: A Systematic Review.

Pakkasjärvi N, Krishnan N, Ripatti L, Anand S.J Clin Med. 2022 Nov 24;11(23):6935. doi: 10.3390/jcm11236935.PMID: 36498510 Free PMC article. Review.

Da Vinci robot-assisted pancreato-duodenectomy in a patient with situs inversus totalis: A case report and review of literature.

Li BB, Lu SL, He X, Lei B, Yao JN, Feng SC, Yu SP.World J Gastrointest Oncol. 2022 Jul 15;14(7):1363-1371. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v14.i7.1363.PMID: 36051094 Free PMC article.

Telerehabilitation during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Patients and Physical Therapists' Experiences.

Buabbas AJ, Albahrouh SE, Alrowayeh HN, Alshawaf H.Med Princ Pract. 2022;31(2):156-164. doi: 10.1159/000523775. Epub 2022 Feb 24.PMID: 35203079 Free PMC article.

KMEL References

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

References

  1.  
    1. Van Koughnett JA, Jayaraman S, Eagleson R, Quan D, van Wynsberghe A, Schlachta CM (2009) Are there advantages to robotic-assisted surgery over laparoscopy from the surgeon's perspective? J Robot Surg 3(2):79–82. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-009-0144-8 - DOI -PubMed
  2.  
    1. Imkamp F, Herrmann TR, Tolkach Y, Dziuba S, Stolzenburg JU, Rassweiler J, Sulser T, Zimmermann U, Merseburger AS, Kuczyk MA, Burchardt M (2015) Acceptance, prevalence and indications for robot-assisted laparoscopy—results of a survey among urologists in Germany Austria and Switzerland. Urol Int 95(3):336–345. https://doi.org/10.1159/000430502 - DOI -PubMed
  3.  
    1. Azhar RA, Mobaraki AA, Badr HM, Nedal N, Nassir AM (2018) Current status of robot-assisted urologic surgery in Saudi Arabia: trends and opinions from an Internet-based survey. Urol Ann 10(3):263–269. https://doi.org/10.4103/UA.UA_8_18 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
  4.  
    1. Al-Alao OPJ, Abinahed J, et al (2013) Development of robot-assisted surgery in Qatar. In: 6th Hamlyn symposium on medical robotics, Imperial College London, UK, June 2013, pp 89–90
  5.  
    1. Azhar RA, Elkoushy MA, Aldousari S (2019) Robot-assisted urological surgery in the Middle East: where are we and how far can we go? Arab J Urol 17(2):106–113. https://doi.org/10.1080/2090598X.2019.1601003 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
  6.  
    1. Boys JA, Alicuben ET, DeMeester MJ, Worrell SG, Oh DS, Hagen JA, DeMeester SR (2016) Public perceptions on robotic surgery, hospitals with robots, and surgeons that use them. Surg Endosc 30(4):1310–1316. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-015-4368-6 - DOI - PubMed
  7.  
    1. Ahmad A, Ahmad ZF, Carleton JD, Agarwala A (2017) Robotic surgery: current perceptions and the clinical evidence. Surg Endosc 31(1):255–263. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-4966-y -DOI - PubMed
  8.  
    1. Robinson M, Macneily A, Goldenberg L, Black P (2012) Status of robotic-assisted surgery among Canadian urology residents. Can Urol Assoc J 6(3):160–167. https://doi.org/10.5489/cuaj.11190 -DOI - PubMed - PMC
  9.  
    1. duPont NC, Chandrasekhar R, Wilding G, Guru KA (2010) Current trends in robot assisted surgery: a survey of gynecologic oncologists. Int J Med Robot 6(4):468–472. https://doi.org/10.1002/rcs.357 - DOI - PubMed
  10.  
    1. Farivar BS, Flannagan M, Leitman IM (2015) General surgery residents' perception of robot-assisted procedures during surgical training. J Surg Educ 72(2):235–242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsurg.2014.09.008 - DOI - PubMed
  11.  
    1. Krause W, Bird J (2019) Training robotic community surgeons: our experience implementing a robotics curriculum at a rural community general surgery training program. J Robot Surg 13(3):385–389. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-018-0860-z - DOI - PubMed
  12.  
    1. Maizlin II, Shroyer MC, Yu DC, Martin CA, Chen MK, Russell RT (2017) Survey on robot-assisted surgical techniques utilization in US Pediatric Surgery Fellowships. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 27(2):186–190. https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2016.0237 - DOI - PubMed
  13.  
    1. Pickett SD, James RL, Mahajan ST (2013) Teaching robotic surgery skills: comparing the methods of generalists and subspecialists. Int J Med Robot 9(4):472–476. https://doi.org/10.1002/rcs.1511- DOI - PubMed
  14.  
    1. Wright JD, Raglan GB, Schulkin J, Fialkow MF (2017) Attitudes and beliefs regarding the utility of robotically assisted gynecologic surgery among practicing gynecologists. J Healthc Qual 39(4):211–218. https://doi.org/10.1097/JHQ.0000000000000017 - DOI - PubMed
  15.  
    1. Benmessaoud C, Kharrazi H, MacDorman KF (2011) Facilitators and barriers to adopting robotic-assisted surgery: contextualizing the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. PLoS ONE 6(1):e16395. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0016395 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
  16.  
    1. Dixon PR, Grant RC, Urbach DR (2015) The impact of marketing language on patient preference for robot-assisted surgery. Surg Innov 22(1):15–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/1553350614537562 -DOI - PubMed
  17.  
    1. Randell R, Honey S, Alvarado N, Greenhalgh J, Hindmarsh J, Pearman A, Jayne D, Gardner P, Gill A, Kotze A, Dowding D (2019) Factors supporting and constraining the implementation of robot-assisted surgery: a realist interview study. BMJ Open 9(6):e028635. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028635 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
  18.  
    1. McDermott H, Choudhury N, Lewin-Runacres M, Aemn I, Moss E (2020) Gender differences in understanding and acceptance of robot-assisted surgery. J Robot Surg 14(1):227–232. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-019-00960-z - DOI - PubMed
  19.  
    1. Poch MA, Stegemann AP, Rehman S, Sharif MA, Hussain A, Consiglio JD, Wilding GE, Guru KA (2014) Short-term patient reported health-related quality of life (HRQL) outcomes after robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC). BJU Int 113(2):260–265. https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.12162 -DOI - PubMed
  20.  
    1. Bittner Iv JG, Cesnik LW, Kirwan T, Wolf L, Guo D (2018) Patient perceptions of acute pain and activity disruption following inguinal hernia repair: a propensity-matched comparison of robotic-assisted, laparoscopic, and open approaches. J Robot Surg 12(4):625–632. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-018-0790-9 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
  21.  
    1. Long E, Kew F (2018) Patient satisfaction with robotic surgery. J Robot Surg 12(3):493–499. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-017-0772-3 - DOI - PubMed

 

Page Navigation