National transparency assessment of Kuwait's pharmaceutical sector
Affiliations
Affiliations
- Director of Healthcare Planning & Development department, Dasman Diabetes Institute, Kuwait.
- Senior Healthcare Planning & Information Team leader, Dasman, Diabetes Institute, Kuwait. Electronic address: yousuf.alkhamis@dasmaninstitute.org.
- Assistant Professor of Pharmacology and Therapeutics at Kuwait, University School of Pharmacy, Kuwait.
- Director General, Dasman Diabetes Institute, Kuwait.
Abstract
Objectives: Corruption is one of several factors that may hinder the access to pharmaceuticals. Since Kuwait has the highest per-capita spending on pharmaceuticals in the region, we wanted to evaluate the level of transparency in its pharmaceutical sector using an established assessment tool adapted by the World Health Organization.
Methods: Standardized questionnaires were conducted via semi-structured interviews with key informants to measure the level of transparency in eight functions of the public pharmaceutical sector.
Results: The scores for the degree of vulnerability to corruption reflected marginal to moderate venerability to corruption for most pharmaceutical sectors. The perceived strengths included availability of appropriate laws, the presence of clear standard operating procedures, and the use of an efficient registration/distribution system. Weaknesses included lack of conflict of interest guidelines and written terms of reference, absence of pharmacoeconomic studies, and inconsistencies in law enforcement.
Conclusions: Findings reveal that few functions of Kuwait pharmaceutical sector remain fairly vulnerable to corruption. However, the willingness of Kuwait Ministry of Health to adopt the assessment study and the acknowledgement of the weaknesses of current processes of the pharmaceutical sector may assist to achieve a transparent pharmaceutical system in the near future.
Keywords: Corruption; Governance of medicine; Kuwait; Pharmaceuticals; WHO.
Similar articles
Transparency in Nigeria's public pharmaceutical sector: perceptions from policy makers.
Garuba HA, Kohler JC, Huisman AM.Global Health. 2009 Oct 29;5:14. doi: 10.1186/1744-8603-5-14.PMID: 19874613 Free PMC article.
Grundy Q, Parker L, Wong A, Fusire T, Dimancesco D, Tisocki K, Walkowiak H, Vian T, Kohler J.Global Health. 2022 Mar 18;18(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s12992-022-00822-8.PMID: 35303902 Free PMC article.
Pharmaceuticals and medical devices: business practices.
Steiner DJ.Issue Brief Health Policy Track Serv. 2013 Dec 30:1-36.PMID: 24482889 No abstract available.
Tackling corruption in the pharmaceutical systems worldwide with courage and conviction.
Cohen JC, Mrazek M, Hawkins L.Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2007 Mar;81(3):445-9. doi: 10.1038/sj.clpt.6100074. Epub 2007 Jan 24.PMID: 17251983 Review.
Conflicts of interest with the health industry.
Dubois MY.Pain Med. 2006 Sep-Oct;7(5):463-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2006.00215_3.x.PMID: 17014609 Review. No abstract available.
Cited by
Esfandiari A, Yazdi-Feyzabadi V, Zarei L, Rashidian A, Salari H.BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Dec 7;21(1):1316. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-07319-x.PMID: 34876113 Free PMC article.