Measuring Voluntary Control Over Hallucinations: The Yale Control Over Perceptual Experiences (COPE) Scales

Affiliations


Abstract

Auditory verbal hallucinations (AVH) frequently cause significant distress and dysfunction, and may be unresponsive to conventional treatments. Some voice-hearers report an ability to fully control the onset and offset of their AVH, making them significantly less disruptive. Measuring and understanding these abilities may lead to novel interventions to enhance control over AVH. Fifty-two voice-hearers participated in the pilot study. 318 participants with frequent AVH participated in the validation study. A pool of 59 items was developed by a diverse team including voice-hearers and clinicians. After the pilot study, 35 items were retained. Factorial structure was assessed with exploratory (EFA, n = 148) and confirmatory (CFA, n = 170) factor analyses. Reliability and convergent validity were assessed using a comprehensive battery of validated phenomenological and clinical scales. CFA on the final 18 items supported two factors for a Methods of Control Scale (5 items each, average ω = .87), and one factor for a Degree of Control Scale (8 items, average ω = .95). Correlation with clinical measures supported convergent validity. Degree of control was associated with positive clinical outcomes in voice-hearers both with and without a psychosis-spectrum diagnosis. Degree of control also varied with quality of life independently of symptom severity and AVH content. The Yale control over perceptual experiences (COPE) Scales robustly measure voice-hearers' control over AVH and exhibit sound psychometric properties. Results demonstrate that the capacity to voluntarily control AVH is independently associated with positive clinical outcomes. Reliable measurement of control over AVH will enable future development of interventions meant to bolster that control.

Keywords: Development; auditory hallucinations; control; questionnaire; validation.


Similar articles

Time varying dynamics of hallucinations in clinical and non-clinical voice-hearers.

Marschall TM, Koops S, Brederoo SG, Cabral J, Ćurčić-Blake B, Sommer IEC.Neuroimage Clin. 2023;37:103351. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2023.103351. Epub 2023 Feb 14.PMID: 36805417 Free PMC article.

A data-driven linguistic characterization of hallucinated voices in clinical and non-clinical voice-hearers.

Corona-Hernández H, Brederoo SG, de Boer JN, Sommer IEC.Schizophr Res. 2022 Mar;241:210-217. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2022.01.055. Epub 2022 Feb 9.PMID: 35151122

Negative content in auditory verbal hallucinations: a natural language processing approach.

de Boer JN, Corona Hernández H, Gerritse F, Brederoo SG, Wijnen FNK, Sommer IE.Cogn Neuropsychiatry. 2022 Mar-May;27(2-3):139-149. doi: 10.1080/13546805.2021.1941831. Epub 2021 Jun 21.PMID: 34154512

Auditory verbal hallucinations and continuum models of psychosis: A systematic review of the healthy voice-hearer literature.

Baumeister D, Sedgwick O, Howes O, Peters E.Clin Psychol Rev. 2017 Feb;51:125-141. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2016.10.010. Epub 2016 Nov 1.PMID: 27866082 Free PMC article. Review.

Voluntary control of auditory hallucinations: phenomenology to therapeutic implications.

Swyer A, Powers AR 3rd.NPJ Schizophr. 2020 Aug 4;6(1):19. doi: 10.1038/s41537-020-0106-8.PMID: 32753641 Free PMC article. Review.


Cited by

Listening to and Believing Derogatory and Threatening Voices.

Sheaves B, Johns L, Loe BS, Bold E, Černis E; McPin Hearing Voices Lived Experience Advisory Panel; Molodynski A, Freeman D.Schizophr Bull. 2023 Jan 3;49(1):151-160. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbac101.PMID: 35947487 Free PMC article.

Voice-Hearing Across The Continuum: A Phenomenology of Spiritual Voices.

Moseley P, Powell A, Woods A, Fernyhough C, Alderson-Day B.Schizophr Bull. 2022 Sep 1;48(5):1066-1074. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbac054.PMID: 35733238 Free PMC article.


KMEL References