Robot-assisted urological surgery in the Middle East: Where are we and how far can we go?

Raed A Azhar 1, Mohamed A Elkoushy 2, Saad Aldousari 3

Affiliations

doi: 10.1080/2090598X.2019.1601003

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate robot-assisted surgery (RAS) in Urology in the Middle East, and its status and future perspectives. Methods: A Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (MEDLINE) search was performed using the following keywords: 'robotics', 'robot-assisted surgery', 'laparoscopy', at first with each specific procedure name, such as radical cystectomy, followed by 'Middle East' and country names. All abstracts and articles in English that adhered to the scope of the current issue were selected, giving special consideration to relevant landmark articles and those describing trends and the future of RAS in Urology. Results: Only a few index case reports characterised RAS in the Middle East. The Middle East possess only 1% of the da Vinci® Surgical Systems (Intuitive Surgical Inc., Sunnyvale, CA, USA) installed worldwide, including 19 in Saudi Arabia; six in Qatar; two in each of Kuwait and Lebanon; three in the United Arab Emirates; and only one in Egypt. The total number of RAS performed in the Middle East is low compared to Europe and the USA. Many countries in the Middle East still lack surgical robots despite having the expertise and appropriate caseload, whilst others seem not to utilise the surgical robot at a suitable rate, as reflected by the sparse number of operated cases and outgoing publications. There are major differences in RAS availability, usage, and perception according to the geographical place of practice and acceptance of robots by surgeons and patients. Conclusion: RAS in Urology continues to grow in the Middle East, with increasing caseloads and diversity of operated cases. Acceptance of robots by Middle East surgeons is significantly increasing. Abbreviations: 3D: three-dimensional; KSA: Kingdom Saudi Arabia;MIS: minimally invasive surgery; RAA: robot-assisted adrenalectomy; RAP: robot-assisted pyeloplasty; (O)(RA)PN: (open) (robot-assisted) partial nephrectomy; RAS: robot-assisted surgery; (O)(RA)RC: (open) (robot-assisted) radical cystectomy; (RA)RP: (robot-assisted) radical prostatectomy; SAUC: Sabah Al-Ahmad Urology Center.

Keywords: Middle East; Minimally invasive surgery; radical cystectomy; radical nephrectomy; radical prostatectomy; robot-assisted surgery.

Figures

Figure 1. Urological RAS performed at KSA before and after 2010.

Figure 1. Urological RAS performed at KSA before and after 2010.

Figure 2. Distribution of urological RAS over years since the introduction of the da Vinci® robots at KSA.

Figure 2. Distribution of urological RAS over years since the introduction of the da Vinci® robots at KSA.

Figure 3. Distribution of RAS over the years since the introduction of the da Vinci® robots in Kuwait.

Figure 3. Distribution of RAS over the years since the introduction of the da Vinci® robots in Kuwait.

Similar articles

Expanding the indications of robotic surgery in urology: A systematic review of the literature.

Pal RP, Koupparis AJ.Arab J Urol. 2018 Aug 7;16(3):270-284. doi: 10.1016/j.aju.2018.05.005. eCollection 2018 Sep.PMID: 30147957 Free PMC article. Review.

Comparative analysis of global practice patterns in urologic robot-assisted surgery.

Yuh BE, Hussain A, Chandrasekhar R, Bienko M, Piacente P, Wilding G, Menon M, Peabody J, Guru KA.J Endourol. 2010 Oct;24(10):1637-44. doi: 10.1089/end.2010.0024.PMID: 20818990

The development of robotic surgery in the Middle East.

Rabah DM, Al-Abdin OZ.Arab J Urol. 2012 Mar;10(1):10-6. doi: 10.1016/j.aju.2011.12.001. Epub 2012 Jan 26.PMID: 26557999 Free PMC article. Review.

The age of robotic surgery - Is laparoscopy dead?

Schwaibold H, Wiesend F, Bach C.Arab J Urol. 2018 Jul 30;16(3):262-269. doi: 10.1016/j.aju.2018.07.003. eCollection 2018 Sep.PMID: 30140462 Free PMC article. Review.

From Leonardo to da Vinci: the history of robot-assisted surgery in urology.

Yates DR, Vaessen C, Roupret M.BJU Int. 2011 Dec;108(11):1708-13; discussion 1714. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10576.x. Epub 2011 Sep 27.PMID: 21951677

Cited by

Saudi Urological Association consensus guidelines on the use of robotic surgery in urology.

Azhar RA, Rabah D, Alenizi AM, Alammari A, Alasker A, Alqahtani AA, Alsaikhan BH, Alyami FA, Alzahrani HM, Alothman KI, Moazin MS, Alhgbani M, Baghdadi M, Alotaibi MF.Urol Ann. 2022 Jul-Sep;14(3):199-204. doi: 10.4103/ua.ua_46_22. Epub 2022 Jul 18.PMID: 36117790 Free PMC article. Review.

A Descriptive Comparative Analysis of the Surgical Management of Adrenal Tumors: The Open, Robotic, and Laparoscopic Approaches.

Al-Thani H, Al-Thani N, Al-Sulaiti M, Tabeb A, Asim M, El-Menyar A.Front Surg. 2022 Mar 3;9:848565. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.848565. eCollection 2022.PMID: 35310427 Free PMC article.

Market potentials of robotic systems in medical science: analysis of the Avatera robotic system.

Liatsikos E, Tsaturyan A, Kyriazis I, Kallidonis P, Manolopoulos D, Magoutas A.World J Urol. 2022 Jan;40(1):283-289. doi: 10.1007/s00345-021-03809-z. Epub 2021 Aug 23.PMID: 34424374 Free PMC article.

Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in the Middle East: A report on the perioperative outcomes from a tertiary care centre in Lebanon.

Labban M, Bulbul M, Wazzan W, Khauli R, El Hajj A.Arab J Urol. 2020 Aug 26;19(2):152-158. doi: 10.1080/2090598X.2020.1814184.PMID: 34104490 Free PMC article.

Total robotic surgical volume influences outcomes of low-volume robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy over an extended duration.

Aldousari S, Yaiesh S, Alkandari O.Can Urol Assoc J. 2021 Sep;15(9):E458-E464. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.6880.PMID: 33591897 Free PMC article.

KMEL References

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/

References

  1.  
    1. Khan MS, Elhage O, Challacombe B, et al. Long-term outcomes of robot-assisted radical cystectomy for bladder cancer. Eur Urol. 2013;64:219–224. - PubMed
  2.  
    1. Yuh B, Artibani W, Heidenreich A, et al. The role of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection in the management of high-risk prostate cancer: a systematic review. Eur Urol. 2014;65:918–927. - PubMed
  3.  
    1. Novara G, Catto JW, Wilson T, et al. Systematic review and cumulative analysis of perioperative outcomes and complications after robot-assisted radical cystectomy. Eur Urol. 2015;67:376–401. - PubMed
  4.  
    1. Asimakopoulos AD, Miano R, Annino F, et al. Robotic radical nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma: a systematic review. BMC Urol. 2014;14:75. - PMC - PubMed
  5.  
    1. Bentas W, Wolfram M, Bräutigam R, et al. Vinci robot assisted Anderson-Hynes dismembered pyeloplasty: technique and 1-year follow-up. World J Urol. 2003;21:133–138. - PubMed
  6.  
    1. Gettman MT, Peschel R, Neururer R, et al. A comparison of laparoscopic pyeloplasty performed with the daVinci robotic system versus standard laparoscopic techniques: initial clinical results. Eur Urol. 2002;42:453–457. - PubMed
  7.  
    1. Mettler L, Schollmeyer T, Boggess JF, et al. Robotic assistance in gynecological oncology. Curr Opin Oncol. 2008;20:581–589. - PubMed
  8.  
    1. Nezhat C, Lavie O, Lemyre M, et al. Robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery in gynecology: scientific dream or reality? Fertil Steril. 2009;91:2620–2622. - PubMed
  9.  
    1. Yuh BE, Hussain A, Chandrasekhar R, et al. Comparative Analysis of global practice patterns in urologic robot-assisted surgery. J Endourol. 2010;24(10):1637–1644. - PubMed
  10.  
    1. Intuitive Surgical da Vinci’s manufacturer [cited 2018 June] Available from: https://www.scribd.com/document/290566330/Intuitive-Surgical-Investor-Pr...
  11.  
    1. Rabah DM, Zin Al-Abdin O.. The development of robotic surgery in the Middle East. Arab J Urol. 2012;10:10–16. - PMC - PubMed
  12.  
    1. Hemal AK, Abol-Enein H, Tewari A, et al. Robotic radical cystectomy and urinary diversion in the management of bladder cancer. Urol Clin North Am. 2004;31:719–729. - PubMed
  13.  
    1. El-Tabey NA, Shoma AM. Port site metastases after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical cystectomy. Urology. 2005;66:1110.e1–1110.e3. - PubMed
  14.  
    1. Atallah MM, Othman MM. Robotic laparoscopic radical cystectomy inhalational versus total intravenous anesthesia: a pilot study. Middle East J Anaesthesiol. 2009;20:257–263. - PubMed
  15.  
    1. Al-Alao O, Peyrat J, Abinahed J, et al. Development of robot-assisted surgery in Qatar - Camera Ready Copy. 6th Hamlyn Symposium on Medical Robotics; 2013: 89–90. DOI:10.13140/RG.2.1.3060.9685 - DOI
  16.  
    1. Aldousari S, Almarzouq A, Al-Yousef RJ, et al. Robotic surgery in Kuwait: the first experience. Can Urol Assoc J. 2015;9(Suppl. 2):S77.
  17.  
    1. Aldousari S, Almarzouq A, Al-Yousef RJ, et al. Robotic surgery in Kuwait: the first experience. Conference: Canadian Urological Association 2015, Ottawa [cited 2018 June] Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/280133601_UP0511
  18.  
    1. Aldousari S, Abul F, Khajah M, et al. Does a standardized algorithm for managing patients post-robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy improve recovery? Experience with the optimized surgical journey. Eur Urol Suppl. 2016;15:293 [Abstract PE78].
  19.  
    1. Al-Yousef R, Almarzouq A, Aldousari S. Robotic pyelolithotomy in a congenital pelvic kidney: side docking and robotic prostatectomy port - site approach. Int Braz J Urol. 2017;43:374. - PMC - PubMed
  20.  
    1. Park SY, Jeong W, Ham WS, et al. Initial experience of robotic nephron-ureterectomy: a hybrid-port technique. BJU Int. 2009;104:1718–1721. - PubMed
  21.  
    1. Montorsi F, Wilson TG, Rosen RC, et al. Best practices in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: recommendations of the Pasadena consensus panel. Eur Urol. 2012;62:368–381. - PubMed
  22.  
    1. Liss MA, Skarecky D, Morales B, et al. Preventing complications of robot assisted radical prostatectomy. Urology. 2013;81:319–323. - PMC - PubMed
  23.  
    1. Tewari A, Sooriakumaran P, Bloch DA, et al. Wiklund P Surgical margin and perioperative complication rates of primary surgical treatments for prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing retropubic, laparoscopic, and robotic prostatectomy. Eur Urol. 2012;62:1–15. - PubMed
  24.  
    1. Diaz M, Peabody JO, Kapoor V, et al. Oncologic outcomes at 10 years following robotic radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol. 2015;67:1168–1176. - PubMed
  25.  
    1. Ficarra V, Novara G, Ahlering TE, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting potency rates after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol. 2012;62:418–430. - PubMed
  26.  
    1. Ficarra V, Rossanese M, Gnech M, et al. Outcomes and limitations of laparoscopic and robotic partial nephrectomy. Curr Opin Urol. 2014;24:441–447. - PubMed
  27.  
    1. Tanagho YS, Kaouk JH, Allaf ME, et al. Perioperative complications of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: analysis of 886 patients at 5 United States centers. Urology. 2013;81:573–579. - PubMed
  28.  
    1. Khalifeh A, Kaouk JH, Bhayani S, et al. Positive surgical margins in robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: a multi-institutional analysis of oncologic outcomes (leave no tumor behind). J Urol. 2013;190:1674–1679. - PubMed
  29.  
    1. Khalifeh A, Autorino R, Eyraud R, et al. Three-year oncologic and renal functional outcomes after robot-assisted partial nephrectomy. Eur Urol. 2013;64:744–750. - PubMed
  30.  
    1. Masson-Lecomte A, Bensalah K, Seringe E, et al. A prospective comparison of surgical and pathological outcomes obtained after robot-assisted or pure laparoscopic partial nephrectomy in moderate to complex renal tumors: results from a French multicenter collaborative study. BJU Int. 2013;111:256–263. - PubMed
  31.  
    1. Al-Daghmin A, Aboumohamed A, Din R, et al. Readmission after robot-assisted radical cystectomy: outcomes and predictors at 90-day follow-up. Urology. 2014;83:350–356. - PMC - PubMed
  32.  
    1. Parekh DJ, Reis IM, Castle EP, et al. Robot-assisted radical cystectomy versus open radical cystectomy in patients with bladder cancer (RAZOR): an open-label, randomised, phase 3, non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2018;391:2525–2536. - PubMed
  33.  
    1. Hayn MH, Hussain A, Mansour AM, et al. The learning curve of robot-assisted radical cystectomy: results from the international robotic cystectomy consortium. Eur Urol. 2010;58:197–202. - PubMed
  34.  
    1. Johar RS, Hayn MH, Stegemann AP, et al. Complications after robot-assisted radical cystectomy: results from the International Robotic Cystectomy Consortium. Eur Urol. 2013;64:52–57. - PubMed
  35.  
    1. Collins JW, Sooriakumaran P, Sanchez-Salas R, et al. Robot-assisted radical cystectomy with intracorporeal neobladder diversion: the Karolinska experience. Indian J Urol. 2014;30:307–313. - PMC - PubMed
  36.  
    1. Dasgupta P, Rimington P, Murphy D, et al. Robot-assisted radical cystectomy for bladder cancer and 2-year follow-up. BJU Int. 2007;99(Suppl. 4):P35.
  37.  
    1. Teo XL, Lim SK. Robotic assisted adrenalectomy: is it ready for prime time? Investig Clin Urol. 2016;57(Suppl. 2):S130–46. - PMC - PubMed
  38.  
    1. Brunaud L, Ayav A, Zarnegar R, et al. Prospective evaluation of 100 robotic-assisted unilateral adrenalectomies. Surgery. 2008;144:995–1001. - PubMed
  39.  
    1. Giulianotti PC, Buchs NC, Addeo P, et al. Robot-assisted adrenalectomy: a technical option for the surgeon? Int J Med Robot. 2011;7:27–32. - PubMed
  40.  
    1. Brunaud L, Bresler L, Ayav A, et al. Robotic-assisted adrenalectomy: what advantages compared to lateral transperitoneal laparoscopic adrenalectomy? Am J Surg. 2008;195:433–438. - PubMed
  41.  
    1. Menon M, Hemal AK, Tewari A, et al. Nerve-sparing robot-assisted radical cystoprostatectomy and urinary diversion. BJU Int. 2003;92:232–236. - PubMed
  42.  
    1. Hilal L, Shahait M, Mukherji D, et al. Prostate cancer in the Arab world: a view from the inside. Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2015;13:505–511. - PubMed
  43.  
    1. Shahait M, Khauli R, Saoud R, et al. Impact of introducing robotic assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) on surgical volume at a major Middle Eastern institution. Eur Urol Suppl. 2015;14:e1364.
  44.  
    1. Gupta NP, Nayyar R, Hemal AK, et al. Outcome analysis of robotic pyeloplasty: a large single-center experience. BJU Int. 2010;105:980–983. - PubMed
  45.  
    1. Nayyar R, Gupta NP, Hemal AK. Robotic management of complicated ureteropelvic junction obstruction. World J Urol. 2010;28:599–602. - PubMed
  46.  
    1. Azhar RA, Mobaraki AA, Badr HM, et al. Current status of robot-assisted urologic surgery in Saudi Arabia: trends and opinions from an internet-based survey. Urol Ann. 2018;10:263–269. - PMC - PubMed

Page Navigation