Comparison of Short-Term Oral Impacts Experienced by Patients Treated with Invisalign or Conventional Fixed Orthodontic Appliances

Affiliations

01 January 2020

-

doi: 10.1159/000505459


Abstract

Objectives: Our objective was to test the hypothesis that thermoplastic clear aligners (Invisalign®; Align Technology, Santa Clara, CA, USA) are more pleasant for patients than conventional fixed orthodontic appliances.

Subjects and methods: This was an observational retrospective study in which subjects were matched for age, treatment modality, and the treating orthodontist. A total of 60 adult patients (30 in the Invisalign group and 30 in the conventional buccal fixed appliance group) who met the inclusion criteria completed a validated self-reporting questionnaire, rating their experience after appliance activation in regard to oral impact experience and satisfaction of both treatment modalities. Categorical variables were compared using the χ2 test, Fisher's exact test, and the Z test. Continuous variables such as pain level and age were analyzed using the 2-sample t test.

Results: Patients on clear aligner therapy reported significantly more difficulty in speech (p = 0.035) necessitating change in speech delivery (p = 0.003). In addition, they reported better chewing ability (p < 0.001), no restrictions on amounts or types of food (p = 0.02), and less mucosal ulcerations (p = 0.01). Effects on daily routine, use of analgesics, and overall treatment satisfaction were not significantly different between the 2 groups.

Conclusion: Clear aligner therapy is not necessarily more pleasant, but it is more tolerable as it satisfies patient needs over food consumption and absence of mucosal ulcerations. However, clear aligners affect pronunciation and speech delivery in the short term.

Keywords: Braces; Dentistry; Fixed appliance therapy; Invisalign; Oral health-related quality of life; Oral impacts; Orthodontics; Patients.


Similar articles

A comparison of treatment impacts between Invisalign aligner and fixed appliance therapy during the first week of treatment.

Miller KB, McGorray SP, Womack R, Quintero JC, Perelmuter M, Gibson J, Dolan TA, Wheeler TT.Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007 Mar;131(3):302.e1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.05.031.PMID: 17346581

Quality of life in an adolescent orthodontic population.

Sharma R, Drummond R, Wiltshire W, Schroth R, Lekic M, Bertone M, Tate R.Angle Orthod. 2021 Nov 1;91(6):718-724. doi: 10.2319/062820-592.1.PMID: 34260709 Free PMC article.

Outcome assessment of orthodontic clear aligner vs fixed appliance treatment in a teenage population with mild malocclusions.

Borda AF, Garfinkle JS, Covell DA, Wang M, Doyle L, Sedgley CM.Angle Orthod. 2020 Jul 1;90(4):485-490. doi: 10.2319/122919-844.1.PMID: 33378505 Free PMC article.

Do orthodontic treatments using fixed appliances and clear aligner achieve comparable quality of occlusal contacts?

Al-Dboush RE, Al-Zawawi E, El-Bialy T.Evid Based Dent. 2022 Dec;23(4):160-161. doi: 10.1038/s41432-022-0844-8. Epub 2022 Dec 16.PMID: 36526845 Review.

[Possibilities and limitations of treatment with clear aligners. An orientation].

Doomen RA, Aydin B, Kuitert R.Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd. 2018 Oct;125(10):533-540. doi: 10.5177/ntvt.2018.10.18131.PMID: 30317374 Review. Dutch.


Cited by

Accuracy of Invisalign® on Upper Incisors: A Systematic Review.

Gonçalves A, Collard A, Monteiro F, Matos D, Carvalho Ó, Azevedo R, Silva FS, Pinho T.Turk J Orthod. 2023 Jun 22;36(2):126-133. doi: 10.4274/TurkJOrthod.2022.2021.0254.PMID: 37346374 Free PMC article.

A systematic review of biocompatibility and safety of orthodontic clear aligners and transparent vacuum-formed thermoplastic retainers: Bisphenol-A release, adverse effects, cytotoxicity, and estrogenic effects.

Yazdi M, Daryanavard H, Ashtiani AH, Moradinejad M, Rakhshan V.Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2023 Mar 28;20:41. eCollection 2023.PMID: 37180685 Free PMC article. Review.

Significance of Non-Statistically Significant Results in the Prediction of Oral Health-Related Quality of Life in Orthodontic Patients: A Survey Using Two Linking Questionnaires.

Santiwong P, Dutsadeeviroj K, Potchanarungvakul K, Leartchotikul T, Jiwsiritrakul T, Sipiyaruk K.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Apr 10;20(8):5446. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20085446.PMID: 37107728 Free PMC article.

Oral Health-Related Quality of Life throughout Treatment with Clear Aligners in Comparison to Conventional Metal Fixed Orthodontic Appliances: A Systematic Review.

Kaklamanos EG, Makrygiannakis MA, Athanasiou AE.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 17;20(4):3537. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20043537.PMID: 36834235 Free PMC article. Review.

Clear aligner treatment for a four-year-old patient with anterior cross-bite and facial asymmetry: A case report.

Zou YR, Gan ZQ, Zhao LX.World J Clin Cases. 2022 May 26;10(15):5088-5096. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i15.5088.PMID: 35801017 Free PMC article.


KMEL References