Microshear bond strength of different restorative materials to teeth with molar-incisor-hypomineralisation (MIH): a pilot study
Affiliations
Affiliations
- Ministry of Health, Al-Ahmadi Governorate, P.O. Box: 24923, 13110, Safat, Kuwait. dr.maryam_arab@outlook.com.
- Department of Restorative Sciences, Faculty of Dentistry, Kuwait University, Kuwait, Kuwait.
- Department of Developmental and Preventive Sciences, Faculty of Dentistry, Kuwait University, Kuwait, Kuwait.
Abstract
Aim: To compare the microshear bond strength of resin based composite (RBC) and resin modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC) restorations when bonded to teeth with molar incisor hypomineralisation (MIH).
Methods: Eleven first permanent molars with MIH were included in this study. Teeth were sectioned mesio-distally producing a total of 22 surfaces for testing. Each specimen was placed inside a plastic ring with the flattened surface in contact with a glass slab. The plastic ring was filled with autopolymerising acrylic resin to imbed the specimen leaving the enamel surface exposed. Each surface was then bonded to 0.96 mm diameter RBC and light cured RMGIC following the manufacturers' instructions. Microshear bond testing was performed after 24 h storage in distilled water at 37 °C. A Bisco shear tester was used to apply shear stress of 1 mm/min until failure. Wilcoxon signed-rank paired-test was used for comparison of bond strength values.
Results: Microshear bond strength of RBC (30.80 ± 8.19 MPa) was significantly higher than that of RMGIC (11.13 ± 6.91 MPa) when bonded to hypomineralised permanent first molars (p < 0.001).
Conclusion: The microshear bond strength of RBC is significantly higher than that of RMGIC when bonded to MIH affected teeth. Therefore, RBC can be recommended as the restoration of choice for teeth with MIH whenever the clinical scenario allows.
Keywords: Bond strength; Enamel; Molar incisor hypomineralisation; Resin composite; Resin modified glass ionomer.
Similar articles
William V, Burrow MF, Palamara JE, Messer LB.Pediatr Dent. 2006 May-Jun;28(3):233-41.PMID: 16805355
Taher NM, Ateyah NZ.J Contemp Dent Pract. 2007 Feb 1;8(2):25-34.PMID: 17277824
Prabhakar AR, Raj S, Raju OS.J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2003 Sep;21(3):86-94.PMID: 14703213
Managing molar-incisor hypomineralization: A systematic review.
Elhennawy K, Schwendicke F.J Dent. 2016 Dec;55:16-24. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2016.09.012. Epub 2016 Sep 28.PMID: 27693779 Review.
Molar-incisor-hypomineralisation: a literature review.
Willmott NS, Bryan RA, Duggal MS.Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2008 Dec;9(4):172-9. doi: 10.1007/BF03262633.PMID: 19054470 Review.
Cited by
Yehia AM, Abdelaziz AM, Badran A.BMC Oral Health. 2022 Aug 2;22(1):323. doi: 10.1186/s12903-022-02356-2.PMID: 35918670 Free PMC article.
KMEL References
References
-
- Dent Mater. 1998 Jun;14(3):212-21 - PubMed
-
- Caries Res. 2001 Sep-Oct;35(5):390-1 - PubMed
-
- N Z Dent J. 2001 Sep;97(429):101-5 - PubMed
-
- Biomaterials. 2002 Sep;23(17):3603-8 - PubMed
-
- Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2003 Sep;4(3):110-3 - PubMed
-
- Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2003 Sep;4(3):121-6 - PubMed
-
- Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2003 Sep;4(3):143-8 - PubMed
-
- Int J Paediatr Dent. 2003 Nov;13(6):411-6 - PubMed
-
- Dent Update. 2004 Jan-Feb;31(1):9-12 - PubMed
-
- Oper Dent. 2004 Mar-Apr;29(2):168-75 - PubMed
-
- Int J Paediatr Dent. 2005 Jan;15(1):20-8 - PubMed
-
- Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2005 Dec;6(4):179-84 - PubMed
-
- Pediatr Dent. 2006 May-Jun;28(3):224-32 - PubMed
-
- Pediatr Dent. 2006 May-Jun;28(3):233-41 - PubMed
-
- Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2008 Dec;9(4):172-9 - PubMed
-
- Int J Paediatr Dent. 2009 Mar;19(2):73-83 - PubMed
-
- Acta Odontol Scand. 2010 Jul;68(4):215-22 - PubMed
-
- Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2010 Apr;11(2):53-8 - PubMed
-
- Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2010 Apr;11(2):65-74 - PubMed
-
- Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2010 Apr;11(2):75-81 - PubMed
-
- Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2012 Sep;5(3):190-6 - PubMed
-
- Dent Mater. 1994 Jul;10(4):236-40 - PubMed