Influence of surface treatment on the resin-bonding of zirconia
Similar articles
An official website of the United States government
Here's how you know
Access keysNCBI HomepageMyNCBI HomepageMain ContentMain Navigation
Search:0 results are available, use up and down arrow keys to navigate.Search
SaveEmail
Send to
Display options
Abstract PubMed PMID
full text links
actions
Cite
Collections
share
page navigation
- Title & authors
- Abstract
- Similar articles
- Cited by
- MeSH terms
- Substances
- Related information
- LinkOut - more resources
Title & authors Abstract Similar articles Cited by MeSH terms Substances Related information LinkOut - more resources
Dent Mater
. 2015 Jun;31(6):657-68.
doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2015.03.004. Epub 2015 Apr 7.
Influence of surface treatment on the resin-bonding of zirconia
Seda Şanlı 1, Mine Dündar Çömlekoğlu 2, Erhan Çömlekoğlu 2, Mehmet Sonugelen 2, Tijen Pamir 3, B W Darvell 4
Affiliations expand
- PMID: 25862408
- DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2015.03.004
Abstract
Objective: To compare the effect of various surface treatments on the bonding of luting resin cements to zirconia under four-point bending.
Methods: Bar specimens (n = 200) (2 mm × 5 mm × 25 mm) were prepared from zirconia blocks (VITA In-Ceram YZ, Vita Zahnfabrik) with the cementation surface (2 mm × 5 mm) of groups of 40 treated in one of five ways: airborne particle abrasion with 50μm Al2O3 (GB), zirconia primer (Z-Prime Plus, Bisco) (Z), glaze ceramic (Crystall.Glaze spray, Ivoclar Vivadent) + hydrofluoric acid (GHF), fusion glass-ceramic (Crystall.Connect, Ivoclar Vivadent) (CC), or left untreated as control (C). Within each treatment, bars were cleaned ultrasonically for 15 min in ethanol and then deionized water before bonding in pairs with one of two luting resins: Panavia F 2.0, (Kuraray) (P); RelyX U-200 (3M/Espe) (R), to form 10 test specimens for each treatment and lute combination. Mechanical tests were performed and bond strengths (MPa) were subject, after log transformation, to analysis of variance, Shapiro-Wilk and Holm-Sidak tests; also log-linear contingency analysis of failure mode distribution; all with α = 0.05. Fracture surfaces were examined under light and scanning electron microscopy.
Results: While the effect of surface treatment was significant (p = 1.27 × 10(-9)), there was no detected effect due to resin (p = 0.829). All treatments except CC (30.1 MPa ×/÷ 1.44)* were significantly better than the untreated control (24.8 MPa ×/÷ 1.35) (p = 3.28 × 10(-9)). While the effect of GB - which gave the highest mean strength (50.5 MPa ×/÷ 1.29) - was not distinguishable from that of GHF (39.9 MPa ×/÷ 1.29) (p = 0.082), it was significantly better than treatment with either CC or Z (33.1 MPa ×/÷ 1.48) (p < 0.05). (* After log transformation for analysis and back; asymmetric error bounds as s.d. in log values.)
Significance: The novel test method design, which has good discriminatory power, confirmed the value of gritblasting as a simple and effective treatment with low operator hazard. It gave the highest bond strengths regardless of the cement type. Glaze layer application followed by hydrofluoric acid-etching on zirconia before cementation might be viable for adhesive zirconia cementation, but represents a much greater hazard as well as having problems with thickness control.
Keywords: Adhesive cementation; Four-point bending test; Zirconia surface treatment.
Copyright © 2015 Academy of Dental Materials. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
Zandparsa R, Talua NA, Finkelman MD, Schaus SE.J Prosthodont. 2014 Feb;23(2):117-23. doi: 10.1111/jopr.12075. Epub 2013 Jul 26.PMID: 23890275
Amaral R, Ozcan M, Bottino MA, Valandro LF.Dent Mater. 2006 Mar;22(3):283-90. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2005.04.021. Epub 2005 Jul 21.PMID: 16039705
Influence of glazed zirconia on dual-cure luting agent bond strength.
Valentino TA, Borges GA, Borges LH, Platt JA, Correr-Sobrinho L.Oper Dent. 2012 Mar-Apr;37(2):181-7. doi: 10.2341/10-220-L. Epub 2011 Dec 14.PMID: 22166107
Meta-analysis of bonding effectiveness to zirconia ceramics.
Inokoshi M, De Munck J, Minakuchi S, Van Meerbeek B.J Dent Res. 2014 Apr;93(4):329-34. doi: 10.1177/0022034514524228. Epub 2014 Feb 21.PMID: 24563487 Review.
Is there a potential for durable adhesion to zirconia restorations? A systematic review.
Tzanakakis EG, Tzoutzas IG, Koidis PT.J Prosthet Dent. 2016 Jan;115(1):9-19. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.09.008. Epub 2015 Nov 6.PMID: 26548872 Review.
Cited by
Rigos AE, Sarafidou K, Kontonasaki E.Jpn Dent Sci Rev. 2023 Dec;59:138-159. doi: 10.1016/j.jdsr.2023.04.002. Epub 2023 May 26.PMID: 37274447 Free PMC article. Review.
Mohit KG, Lakha TA, Chinchwade A, Batul QA, Shaikh M, Kheur SM.J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2022 Apr-Jun;22(2):179-187. doi: 10.4103/jips.jips_298_21.PMID: 36511029 Free PMC article.
Analysis of bond strength between a nylon reinforcement structure and dental resins.
Nakano LJ, Lopes GR, Firmino AS, de Matos JD, Tango RN, Paes-Junior TA.J Clin Exp Dent. 2021 May 1;13(5):e505-e510. doi: 10.4317/jced.57654. eCollection 2021 May.PMID: 33981399 Free PMC article.
Bond strength of surface-treated novel high translucent zirconia to enamel.
Ågren M, Kou W, Molin Thorén M.Biomater Investig Dent. 2019 Nov 4;6(1):35-42. doi: 10.1080/26415275.2019.1684200. eCollection 2019.PMID: 31998870 Free PMC article.
Amer JY, Rayyan MM.J Orthod Sci. 2018 Nov 15;7:23. doi: 10.4103/jos.JOS_154_17. eCollection 2018.PMID: 30547019 Free PMC article.