Variance components of gingival thickness
Affiliations
Affiliations
- Faculty of Dentistry, Kuwait University, Safat, Kuwait. hp.muller@hsc.edu.kw
Abstract
Objectives: Distinct periodontal phenotypes have been identified by cluster analysis, which is an explorative method with very low external validity. The aim of the present study was to investigate variance components of facial gingival thickness in young adults with mild gingivitis.
Material and methods: Thirty-three non-smoking females, 18-23 years of age, with mild or moderate plaque-induced gingivitis participated. Gingival thickness was measured at every tooth present by use of ultrasound technology to the next 0.1 mm with a lowest measurement of 0.5 mm. Periodontal probing depth and clinical attachment level were measured with a pressure-controlled probe. Gingival bleeding index was assessed after probing on a 0-2 scale, where 1 was slight, and 2 was profuse bleeding on probing. The Silness-Loe plaque index was recorded. Multilevel variance components and random intercept models were built.
Results: A 2-level (subject, tooth) variance component model of gingival thickness without any explanatory variable revealed an intercept (mean) of 0.93 +/- 0.02 mm. Subject variation of gingival thickness amounted to 4.2% of the total variance. Addition of tooth- and subject-related covariates to the model revealed, after adjusting for tooth type, an association with periodontal probing depth (estimated coefficient 0.067 +/- 0.025), and considerable association with average bleeding index (-0.395 +/- 0.149) and plaque index (0.125 +/- 0.048). Variation at the tooth level was drastically reduced; subject variation amounted to 5.2%.
Conclusion: Gingival thickness is mainly associated with tooth-related variables. Bleeding tendency is higher if gingiva is thin. Subject variability related to periodontal phenotype may add to the total variance, however, to a very low extent.
Similar articles
Müller HP, Heinecke A.Clin Oral Investig. 2002 Jun;6(2):69-74. doi: 10.1007/s00784-001-0141-4.PMID: 12166716
Repeatability of ultrasonic determination of gingival thickness.
Müller HP, Barrieshi-Nusair KM, Könönen E.Clin Oral Investig. 2007 Dec;11(4):439-42. doi: 10.1007/s00784-007-0125-0. Epub 2007 May 24.PMID: 17522899
Eger T, Müller HP, Heinecke A.J Clin Periodontol. 1996 Sep;23(9):839-45. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051x.1996.tb00621.x.PMID: 8891935
Suitability of gingival indices for use in therapeutic trials. Is bleeding a sine qua non?
Barnett ML.J Clin Periodontol. 1996 Jun;23(6):582-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051x.1996.tb01828.x.PMID: 8811479 Review.
Current status of indices of gingivitis.
Ciancio SG.J Clin Periodontol. 1986 May;13(5):375-8, 381-2. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051x.1986.tb01476.x.PMID: 3522646 Review.
Cited by
Raval YH, Shah MA, Bora NP.J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2022 Sep-Oct;26(5):465-470. doi: 10.4103/jisp.jisp_399_21. Epub 2022 Sep 1.PMID: 36339392 Free PMC article.
Montanha-Andrade K, Crusoé-Rebello IM, Barreto M, Neves FS, Santos JND, Cury PR.Dental Press J Orthod. 2022 Sep 23;27(4):e222136. doi: 10.1590/2177-6709.27.4.e222136.oar. eCollection 2022.PMID: 36169497 Free PMC article.
Santhanakrishnan M, Subramanian V, Ramesh N, Kamaleeshwari R.Clin Cosmet Investig Dent. 2021 Nov 19;13:479-494. doi: 10.2147/CCIDE.S332687. eCollection 2021.PMID: 34824552 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
Anand PS, Bansal A, Shenoi BR, Kamath KP, Kamath NP, Anil S.Clin Oral Investig. 2022 Jan;26(1):751-759. doi: 10.1007/s00784-021-04053-w. Epub 2021 Nov 16.PMID: 34783916
Gingival phenotype distribution in young Caucasian women and men - An investigative study.
Fischer KR, Büchel J, Kauffmann F, Heumann C, Friedmann A, Schmidlin PR.Clin Exp Dent Res. 2022 Feb;8(1):374-379. doi: 10.1002/cre2.482. Epub 2021 Nov 11.PMID: 34766469 Free PMC article.