Fig. 1 Kaplan-Meier plots. a Time to natural tooth loss. b Time to implant failure. c Time of appearance of a technical complication. d Time of appearance of a biological complication.
Affiliations
Affiliations
- Department of General Dental Practice, Kuwait University, Kuwait.
- Department of Developmental and Preventive Sciences, Kuwait University, Kuwait.
- Department of Developmental and Preventive Sciences, Kuwait University, Kuwait. Electronic address: muawia.qudeimat@ku.edu.kw.
Abstract
Aim: There is sparse research on the effect of factors related to the dentist and patient in the caries management decision-making process. This in vitro study explored the influence of factors related to dentists and patients on the management decision of occlusal noncavitated caries lesions in children.
Materials and methods: Five investigators in the specialties of dental public health (DPH), paediatric, prosthetic, and operative dentistry and a general dentist (GDP) participated in this study. Initially, the investigators were asked to independently assess the occlusal surfaces of 175 noncavitated permanent molars and choose a management recommendation using 2 caries risk patients' scenarios. After 1 month, investigators were trained and calibrated to use the International Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDAS) scoring system. Then, they examined the same teeth, recorded the highest/worst ICDAS score, and chose a management recommendation. Two weeks later, the investigators repeated the teeth examination using magnification loupes and again chose a management recommendation. The teeth were sectioned to study the relationship between the presence of caries and the management recommendations.
Results: For the low- and the high-caries risk scenarios, ICDAS training increased the operative intervention by 20% to 27% and 14% to 22%, respectively, for both the GDP and the paediatric dentist (P < .0001). For the low-caries risk scenario, using the magnifying loupes increased the operative recommendations for the DPH, GDP, and the operative dentist by 5% to 23% (P < .05). Compared to the low-caries risk scenario, teeth for patients with high caries risk received more surgical interventions (9%-30%) at all examination conditions for the GDP and the paediatric and operative dentists (P < .0001).
Conclusions: For occlusal noncavitated caries lesions, enhancing dentists' caries detection skills had a significant impact on decisions of surgical intervention. This also influenced the appropriateness of the treatment recommended for the different caries risk groups.
Keywords: Caries management; Caries risk; Clinical decision-making; Dental caries.
Similar articles
Qudeimat MA, Altarakemah Y, Alomari Q, Alshawaf N, Honkala E.BMC Oral Health. 2019 Mar 7;19(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s12903-019-0730-8.PMID: 30845943 Free PMC article.
Khalaf ME, Qudeimat M, Alomari QD, Al-Tarakmeh Y, Honkala E.Oral Health Prev Dent. 2018;16(4):375-380. doi: 10.3290/j.ohpd.a40936.PMID: 30175336
Dentists' perspectives on caries-related treatment decisions.
Gomez J, Ellwood RP, Martignon S, Pretty IA.Community Dent Health. 2014 Jun;31(2):91-8.PMID: 25055606
Are RMGIC restorations as effective with or without selective caries removal in primary molars?
Gibbison R, Crozier R.Evid Based Dent. 2021 Dec;22(4):132-133. doi: 10.1038/s41432-021-0218-7. Epub 2021 Dec 16.PMID: 34916637 Review.
Ahovuo-Saloranta A, Forss H, Hiiri A, Nordblad A, Mäkelä M.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Jan 18;2016(1):CD003067. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003067.pub4.PMID: 26780162 Free PMC article. Updated. Review.
KMEL References
References
-
- Carvalho JC, Dige I, Machiulskiene V, et al. Occlusal caries: biological approach for its diagnosis and management. Caries Res. 2016;50(6):527–542. - PubMed
-
- Machiulskiene V, Campus G, Carvalho JC, et al. Terminology of dental caries and dental caries management: consensus report of a workshop organized by ORCA and Cariology Research Group of IADR. Caries Res. 2020;54(1):7–14. - PubMed
-
- Bader JD, Shugars DA. The evidence supporting alternative management strategies for early occlusal caries and suspected occlusal dentinal caries. J Evid Based Dent Pract. 2006;6(1):91–100. - PubMed
-
- Carvalho JC, Qvist V, Aimée NR, Mestrinho HD, Bakhshandeh A. Diagnosis, risk assessment, and treatment decisions for occlusal caries: a survey from the Danish Public Dental Health Service. Caries Res. 2018;52(1-2):58–70. - PubMed
-
- Qudeimat MA, Al-Saiegh FA, Al-Omari Q, Omar R. Restorative treatment decisions for deep proximal carious lesions in primary molars. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2007;8(1):37–42. - PubMed
-
- Bussaneli DG, Boldieri T, Diniz MB, Rivera LM, Santos-Pinto L, Cordeiro Rde C. Influence of professional experience on detection and treatment decision of occlusal caries lesions in primary teeth. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2015;25(6):418–427. - PubMed
-
- Schwendicke F, Splieth C, Breschi L, et al. When to intervene in the caries process? An expert Delphi consensus statement. Clin Oral Investig. 2019;23(10):3691–3703. - PubMed
-
- Downer MC. Concurrent validity of an epidemiological diagnostic system for caries with the histological appearance of extracted teeth as validating criterion. Caries Res. 1975;9(3):231–246. - PubMed
-
- Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33(1):159–174. - PubMed
-
- Wilson NHF, Lynch CD, Brunton PA, et al. Criteria for the replacement of restorations: Academy of Operative Dentistry European Section. Oper Dent. 2016;41(S7):48–57. - PubMed
-
- Diniz MB, Rodrigues JA, Hug I, Cordeiro Rde C, Lussi A. Reproducibility and accuracy of the ICDAS-II for occlusal caries detection. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2009;37(5):399–404. - PubMed
-
- Altarakemah Y, Al-Sane M, Lim S, Kingman A, Ismail AI. A new approach to reliability assessment of dental caries examinations. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2013;41(4):309–316. - PubMed
-
- Khalaf ME, Qudeimat M, Alomari QD, Al-Tarakmeh Y, Honkala E. Impact of magnifying loupes on interexaminer agreement in the detection of noncavitated occlusal carious lesions. Oral Health Prev Dent. 2018;16(4):375–380. - PubMed
-
- Jobim Jardim J, Henz S, Barbachan E,, Silva B. Restorative treatment decisions in posterior teeth: a systematic review. Oral Health Prev Dent. 2017;15(2):107–115. - PubMed
-
- Rohlin M, Mileman PA. Decision analysis in dentistry-the last 30 years. J Dent. 2000;28(7):453–468. - PubMed
-
- Yorty JS, Walls AT, Wearden S. Caries risk assessment/treatment programs in U.S. dental schools: an eleven-year follow-up. J Dent Educ. 2011;75(1):62–67. - PubMed
-
- Heaven TJ, Gordan VV, Litaker MS, et al. National Dental PBRN Collaborative Group Agreement among dentists’ restorative treatment planning thresholds for primary occlusal caries, primary proximal caries, and existing restorations: findings from the National Dental Practice-Based Research Network. J Dent. 2013;41(8):718–725. - PMC - PubMed
-
- Brostek AM, Walsh LJ. Minimal intervention dentistry in general practice. Oral Health Dent Manag. 2014;13(2):285–294. - PubMed
-
- National Institutes of Health (U.S.). NIH Consensus Development Conference on Diagnosis and Management of Dental Caries Throughout Life. Available from: https://consensus.nih.gov/2001/2001DentalCaries115Program.pdf. Accessed 1 April 2022.
-
- Aryanpur S, van Niewenhuysen J-P, D'Hoore W. Endodontic retreatment decisions: no consensus. Int Endod J. 2000;33(3):208–218. - PubMed