Salivary fluoride concentration following toothbrushing with and without rinsing: a randomised controlled trial
Affiliations
Affiliations
- Department of Paediatric Dentistry, Farwanyia Speciality Dental Centre, Farwanyia, Kuwait.
- Department of Paediatric Dentistry, The University of Leeds School of Dentistry, Clarendon Way, Leeds, LS2 9JT, West Yorkshire, UK.
- Department of Developmental and Preventive Sciences, Kuwait University, Jabriyah, Kuwait.
- Department of Developmental and Preventive Sciences, Kuwait University, Jabriyah, Kuwait. muawia.qudeimat@ku.edu.kw.
- Faculty of Dentistry, Kuwait University, PO Box: 24923, Safat, 13110, Kuwait. muawia.qudeimat@ku.edu.kw.
Abstract
Background: Caries prevalence has declined significantly since the introduction of fluoridated toothpaste. There have been several developments regarding specific active fluoride ingredients but not enough evidence to support one over the other. The purpose of this double-blind randomized controlled trial was to compare salivary fluoride concentrations of different fluoride formulations in the form of toothpaste with and without post-brushing water rinsing in adults.
Methods: The study included 120 participants who were randomly assigned to one of 12 groups (10 participants/group). The toothpaste formulas investigated included (1) fluoride-free (0 ppmF); (2) sodium fluoride (1450 ppmF); (3) sodium monofluorophosphate (1450 ppmF); (4) sodium fluoride and monofluorophosphate combined (1450 ppmF); (5) stannous fluoride and sodium fluoride combined (1450 ppmF); and (6) amine fluoride (1400 ppmF). Block randomisation was used to assign each participant to one of the 12 groups. Participants brushed with 1.0 g of one of the six different toothpaste formulations either with or without post-brushing water rinsing. Saliva was collected at six different times (baseline and at 1, 15, 30, 60, and 90 min/s post-brushing). Samples were analysed using a fluoride ion-specific sensitive electrode connected to an ion analyser.
Results: The demographic characteristics of the participants were not significantly different among the groups (P > 0.05). Time, toothpaste formulation, and post-brushing rinsing routines had significant effects on saliva fluoride retention (P < 0.05). Amine fluoride-containing toothpaste was the only formula that showed statistically significantly higher concentrations of salivary fluoride at 90 min in both the rinsing and non-rinsing groups. Sodium monofluorophosphate toothpaste did not result in a significant difference compared to the control group at any time point, in both rinsing and non-rinsing groups.
Conclusions: Based on the results from this study, no rinsing after toothbrushing in adults can be recommended when sodium monofluorophosphate containing toothpaste formula is used. It also concludes that amine fluoride resulted in a significantly higher saliva fluoride concentration at 90 min in both the rinsing and non-rinsing groups compared to other fluoride toothpaste formulations. Registry: Protocol Registration and Results System (ClinicalTrials.gov).
Clinical trial registration number: NCT02740803 (15/04/2016).
Keywords: Adults; Controlled clinical trial; Fluoride toothpaste; Rinsing.
Conflict of interest statement
Author M.M. Albahrani declares that she has no conflict of interest. Author A. Alyahya declares that she has no conflict of interest. Author M.A. Qudeimat declares that he has no conflict of interest. Author K.J. Toumba declares that he has no conflict of interest.
Figures
Similar articles
Opydo-Szymaczek J, Pawlaczyk-Kamieńska T, Borysewicz-Lewicka M.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Oct 14;19(20):13235. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192013235.PMID: 36293818 Free PMC article.
Attin T, Hellwig E.J Clin Dent. 1996;7(1):6-8.PMID: 9238877 Clinical Trial.
Nazzal H, Duggal MS, Kowash MB, Kang J, Toumba KJ.Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2016 Jun;17(3):165-9. doi: 10.1007/s40368-015-0220-x. Epub 2016 Apr 21.PMID: 27102319 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
After-brush rinsing protocols, frequency of toothpaste use: fluoride and other active ingredients.
Parnell C, O'Mullane D.Monogr Oral Sci. 2013;23:140-53. doi: 10.1159/000350480. Epub 2013 Jun 28.PMID: 23817066 Review.
Walsh T, Worthington HV, Glenny AM, Appelbe P, Marinho VC, Shi X.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Jan 20;(1):CD007868. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007868.pub2.PMID: 20091655 Updated. Review.
Cited by
Hirose M, Murata Y, Fukuda A, Fujita Y, Yahata S, Kaji M, Saitoh M.Clin Oral Investig. 2023 Jun 7. doi: 10.1007/s00784-023-05063-6. Online ahead of print.PMID: 37285102
Correlation between salivary immunoglobulin A and interleukin-1beta in smokers with dental caries.
Al-Ibraheem J, Zyara Y, Al-Quraine N, Abdulridha WM.F1000Res. 2023 May 5;12:175. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.129649.2. eCollection 2023.PMID: 37224312 Free PMC article.
KMEL References
References
-
- Beiswanger BB, Gish CW, Mallatt ME. A three-year study of the effect of a sodium fluoride-silica abrasive dentifrice on dental caries. Pharmacol Ther Dent. 1981;6(1–2):9–16. - PubMed
-
- Hirose M, et al. Fluoride retention in saliva following toothbrushing using different types of fluoridated dentifrices containing 1500 ppmF of NaF and MFP. Ped Dent J. 2015;25(2):45–49. doi: 10.1016/j.pdj.2015.04.001. - DOI
-
- Attin T, Hellwig E. Salivary fluoride content after toothbrushing with a sodium fluoride and an amine fluoride dentifrice followed by different mouthrinsing procedures. J Clin Dent. 1996;7(1):6–8. - PubMed
-
- Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network. 2014. Dental Interventions to Prevent Caries in Children: A national clinical guideline. [SIGN 138]. [Online] Edinburgh: Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network. https://www.scottishdental.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/SIGN138.pdf. Accessed 12 Oct 2021.
-
- Mystikos C, Yoshino T, Ramberg P, Birkhed D. Effect of post-brushing mouthrinse solutions on salivary fluoride retention. Swed Dent J. 2011;35(1):17–24. - PubMed
-
- Sensabaugh C, Sagel ME. Stannous fluoride dentifrice with sodium hexametaphosphate: review of laboratory, clinical and practice-based data. J Dent Hyg. 2009;83(2):70–78. - PubMed